thefurealfriends2
Est. Contributor
- Messages
- 337
- Role
- Diaper Lover
- Diaperfur
I see, they used to have clothing size - not sure why they added years ā¦. Clothing size 14-20 makes more sense than years.thefurealfriends2 said:you know that big debate about them being just for kids? Well now they state up to 20 years.
I share your reaction, @thefurealfriends2 . The XL weight range hasnāt changed but, holy heck, I donāt think Iāve seen the expected wearers of XL Goodnites shown as ā14 to 20 yearsā before.thefurealfriends2 said:And i was likeeView attachment 101776
Probably better to go based on the weight.DanElmontan said:So what do 9 and 13-year olds wear now since there are gaps in the āagesā categories? I think they still technically mean clothing size, but accidentally changed the text to ages.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and third party cookies for purposes such as web analytics.