thefurealfriends2
Est. Contributor
- Messages
- 291
- Role
-
- Diaper Lover
- Diaperfur
I see, they used to have clothing size - not sure why they added years ā¦. Clothing size 14-20 makes more sense than years.thefurealfriends2 said:you know that big debate about them being just for kids? Well now they state up to 20 years.
I share your reaction, @thefurealfriends2 . The XL weight range hasnāt changed but, holy heck, I donāt think Iāve seen the expected wearers of XL Goodnites shown as ā14 to 20 yearsā before.thefurealfriends2 said:And i was likeeš³š³View attachment 101776
Probably better to go based on the weight.DanElmontan said:So what do 9 and 13-year olds wear now since there are gaps in the āagesā categories? I think they still technically mean clothing size, but accidentally changed the text to ages.