coolbabyboy9
Contributor
- Messages
- 50
- Role
- Babyfur
- Diaperfur
- Little
hey what up
I think the main difference is intent with regard to their gender. In my opinion a sissy is female for the pleasure of being female and doesn’t necessarily want to be a woman for all the regular, mundane parts of daily existence 24/7 whereas a trans MTF person does want the full “warts and all” female existence. The MtF trans person will often not identify with the term “sissy” either.peacefullydiapered said:Then what would you say the difference would be between a pre-transitioning or in-transitioning MTF and a sissy?
You sound similar to me.SissyJenny2 said:Hi,
I enjoyed reading the original authors analysis and interpretation on the concept of sissies and LG’s.
It made me think deeply about myself and I’m both but leaning more toward being a sissy as I’m not always in little space and also like to dress as an adult woman too.
Thank you.
Jenny xx
Speaking for myself, and perhaps [x] percentage of other trans LG's... no matter how fulfilling adult life may be as a trans woman, no matter how smooth, successful a transition may be, fully integrating one's self into the real world, there is a void that for some, eats away inside. That feeling of "why couldn't I have been raised as a girl?" The loss, or feeling of being almost robbed of the experiences that cisgender women took for granted, can be very acute. Acting out the LG life as an adult helps some (like me) to fill some void. I say with conviction, "It's MY life, and I don't have to live with this loss. I can still have at least some of the elements I feel I was denied."Adventurer said:Although no statistically valid survey of the LG community has ever been done, there appears to be a high proportion of male-to-female transsexuals, people who are biologically male but identify themselves as female, among those who identify as LGs. In light of this, it is possible that being an LG could be part of larger questions about one's gender.
I love where your at with al of thisBobbiSueEllen said:There are differences in my perspective of it all: being a sissy toddler girl, I prefer being solo in this; just independent, content and able, just like Sue Ellen Armstrong of Arthur. I don't at all enjoy humiliation or being dominated; some do, just not me (but I do love getting spanked when an opportunity arises, LOL..."don't do the battle if ya can't face the paddle!"). This life I live is my expression after decades of being cubbyforced into masculinity just because I 'appear' male and have the plumbing...and failing because I didn't go along with it.
The deal is, I always played better around girls, felt more accepted. Over time, I got burned out on being cubbyforced by males, learned to hate feeling as though it was my 'destiny' to be a regretless, crude, aggressive 'man' (a word I came to detest)...so I denied my forced role and went agender.
Then I discovered Adult Toddler dresses, how so comfy they are...not much frill, simple, clean and with conservative pink/purple themes. Then I decided to dress like my hero, Sue Ellen, and assembled that outfit. That girl knows how to dress for comfort and action!
I just love being to myself, cuddling teddy bears, drinking bottles, enjoying pacifiers, talking with y'all...hoping my someday gets here soon so I can live as the all-out sweet toddler girl I yearn to be...diapers and all. When I get my home, I'd love to have diaper friends over...but no head games, dom/sub stuff or all that. Just good, happy companionship visits, playing with bears, dolls, toys. Sharing a meal, enjoying life: who we are, what we've become.
I guess I have a nonconventional approach to sissy/littlehood. But I'm happy with it. Even though I have a "tickle-tube", I don't mind that. I love what it does but I will never ascribe to it the symbolic value that the rest of the world has...I just wish the world would forget about me and let me be my happy, sweet, at-peace toddler-girl self. Who kinda needs to shave her legs, her diaper area and face.
me as well although dont know about mf three somes. i Stick with female as involved relationship but play time non sexual is good.SissyABSamantha said:I pretty much enjoy most things that are feminine to ultra-feminine, from all little/big ages from zero to 30, that involve ladies only as partners but not any males usually. However I have had 3-somes with MF couples as well as FF couples. However I prefer female rather than male company.
Yeah I went through a period along time ago when I thought I was Bi but it turned out that I didn't really like guys as much as I thought so I went back to being hetero but with some gay tendencies which I settled on. Still prefer the company of ladies though far more than guys.tobebabygirl said:me as well although dont know about mf three somes. i Stick with female as involved relationship but play time non sexual is good.
I guess I'm not a sissy either. I'd been questioning it myself so I'm gonna end the self-debate and just call myself a toddler girl, despite the tickle-toy in my diaper, and leave it at that. I feel like a sweet toddler girl...so that's good enough for me.Narisa said:Huh. Well, I guess I'm not a sissy.
today I learned something new, or at least a new way to interpret, things about myself I guess!
I absolutely feel you! I've mostly used sissy as a shorthand for people who don't get the nuances, but since realizing I'm probably trans, it's felt off to me.Narisa said:I'm happy to have a separate definition, cause I've never quite vibe with the sissy definition- and like w. anything regarding sexuality/preferences, I don't totally vibe with LG either. But more-so than I did with sissy.
likely because I identify as a girl outside of these scenarios. Sissy always had a very masc. aspect to it that turned me off.
an aspect I like about the LG definition over AB/sissy is I'm not into the acting like a little kid thing, and the LG definition seems to leave more room for people who are more of a 'middle' versus a 'little'.