Seasonedcitizen
Est. Contributor
- Messages
- 3,353
- Role
- Diaper Lover
- Sissy
Boys had their hair parted.Sissyleslie said:The following photos are from a book I have called 'Victorian and Edwardian Children From Old Photographs '
View attachment 112089
View attachment 112090
The first two photos are interesting, as it is hard to tell if they are boys in dresses, or merely girls with boyish haircuts. One of the captions in the book actually reads " Boy or girl?, Birmingham c.1890".(The second photo).
There is no doubt that in this 3rd photo, it is definitely a girl. I love the skipping rope. Even though I cannot use one, it would make a great prop if I want to photograph myself in a sissy girl's dress.
View attachment 112091
Search “petticoatpond”, a site for petticoat lovers. Loads of frilly stuff to excite you.Sissyleslie said:As a sissy, I love all that frilly clothing.
I did check the website and it's terrific. In particular, I loved the photos of the young lady dressed as Alice in Wonderland. (And there were lots of them!)Seasonedcitizen said:Search “petticoatpond”, a site for petticoat lovers. Loads of frilly stuff to excite you.
Very cute. Especially the outfits in the 2nd photo.Seasonedcitizen said:Two more Victorian era photos.
I’m old, but not that old. I can’t speak from experience. There may not have been a rush to put boys in pants so potty training wasn’t a priority. Also they might be potty trained but kept in a dress until they out grew it. Clothing was expensive and children grow quickly.BuddyBoy said:Thank you citizen for getting this started and the sissies who contributed to it. Truly delightful. Some of the photos are of boys who appear too old for diapers and baby dresses but are, nevertheless, in girls clothes. Victorian petticoating?
All good points, citizen allow me to offer one more: up to, and through the Victorian era, corporal punishment was the norm. During the latter, half of the 19th century, petty coating was tried as a more humane alternative. The belief was that feminine clothes would calm the rambunctious boy. What do you think?Seasonedcitizen said:I’m old, but not that old. I can’t speak from experience. There may not have been a rush to put boys in pants so potty training wasn’t a priority. Also they might be potty trained but kept in a dress until they out grew it. Clothing was expensive and children grow quickly.
Thank you for sharing, Minara. It reminds me of the ones I wore with velvet short pants during my youth.PooMinara said:I love Victorian-style clothing as well. Some time ago I bought this blouse, and I love everything about it - except for how loose it is around the collar. So I've ripped open the stitches and removed the collar, and now it's just waiting for me to have enough time to get out the sewing machine and add a collar that is higher and tighter.
View attachment 112542
Everything about it screams 'sissy', even the cuffs as you can see in this photo:
View attachment 112543
“Petticoating” is a big theme in CD fantasy stories. I have no idea how or if was used in that period.BuddyBoy said:All good points, citizen allow me to offer one more: up to, and through the Victorian era, corporal punishment was the norm. During the latter, half of the 19th century, petty coating was tried as a more humane alternative. The belief was that feminine clothes would calm the rambunctious boy. What do you think?