- Messages
- 151
- Role
- Diaper Lover
- Little
- Other
When I first signed up, which wasn't too long ago, I noticed that bigender was an "orientation," but transgender wasn't. I feel like it should be though, and it's not that hard of a thing to implement.
Then just say it was an identifierPinkAndLittle said:1) Bi-gender is a sub category under transgender already, just like transexual (ftm & mtf), agender, gender fluid, two-spirited, non binary, ect. are also under transgender. So "bigender was an "orientation," but transgender wasn't" doesn't really make sense.
2) Being transgender is not an orientation and is a completely different thing from a sexual orientation. One is describing who they feel they are, the other describes what they are attacted to.
Also adding. I'm not sure where you saw this but in your account settings you can chose your orientation on the fly and there's no option for bi-gender there. There's bi (bisexual) and asexual (someone who really isn't interested in sex). So those make sense for being there. Currently under your sex there's only male for female, so it wouldn't hurt to add more trans friendly options if people are comfortable sharing that information.
That's fine, and it's because I set it to one answer only and you can't change it.PinkAndLittle said:And ignore my "no" vote. I mis clicked and meant to click yes, but I can't change my answer I guess.
Totally Agree!PinkAndLittle said:1) Bi-gender is a sub category under transgender already, just like transexual (ftm & mtf), agender, gender fluid, two-spirited, non binary, ect. are also under transgender. So "bigender was an "orientation," but transgender wasn't" doesn't really make sense.
2) Being transgender is not an orientation and is a completely different thing from a sexual orientation. One is describing who they feel they are, the other describes what they are attacted to.
Also adding. I'm not sure where you saw this but in your account settings you can chose your orientation on the fly and there's no option for bi-gender there. There's bi (bisexual) and asexual (someone who really isn't interested in sex). So those make sense for being there. Currently under your sex there's only male for female, so it wouldn't hurt to add more trans friendly options if people are comfortable sharing that information.
unneeded? what do you mean? I was trying to answer a question you had. Esp with you tagging the mods, i thought I would give you more information on the matter.TheMatrixIsComing said:Let me just say, I didn't know what an orientation meant exactly, so y'all being so technical on that is unneeded. Thanks for the comment though, I appreciate it.
I actually agree, kind of odd that only has the binary options. I do really think pansexual should be added for Orientation though.Traemo said:All that aside, I think a fourth option under gender might be appropriate; something to the effect of none/all of the above. Leave private, but for those that are openly nonbinary, the option to more accurate self-identify should be available
Yes it's hard if you care about a position in society or see wanting to be with the girls as transgressive in some way.chrischrischris said:been different all my life all ways been taken advantage of all ways wanted to be with girls doing girl stuff
Adair37 said:Hmm I don't think gender is something that shouldn't appear in official forms or be of any consequence. It was important to me years ago when I was 'transitioning ' but now I recognise that there wasn't any transition. I just started acting, dressing and getting hormone treatment but I didn't become a woman. I was that already - so what would I transition from?
Absolutely. I have bad feelings about people who identify as transgender . Often they don't transcend much at all and you can't transcend gender in any meaningful way. In my work and private life I am female. That was what the battle was about in my earlier life.Traemo said:All that aside, I think a fourth option under gender might be appropriate; something to the effect of none/all of the above. Leave private, but for those that are openly nonbinary, the option to more accurate self-identify should be available
Absolutely Yes!Kayleigh said:Couldn’t it just be how you identify which is covered by m/f and perhaps other?