- Messages
- 1,161
- Role
- Adult Baby
- Diaper Lover
- Babyfur
- Diaperfur
- Sissy
- Little
Hey there.
So I’ve been feeling quite a bit of my “sissy” side lately and decided to indulge in exploring a few things and a few stories and such, and found that the internet has quite the varied approach to what a sissy baby is.
Don’t get me wrong, this isn’t my first time seeing this, but this last kind of inspection into such made me realize there is a huge difference out there as to what this means.
For me, being a sissy baby still is very innocent and babyish. It isn’t about sex or such, but more being able to be the little girl that I wasn’t able to be biologically, but yet I figured out later in life that there are things there that interest me.
But I have found that more of the visions of this online is more sexual, BDSM, and a very different universe than what I would ever associate with.
Just as there are adult babies and diaper lovers that this interest is not about sex, or maybe very mildly so, there are others for which it may be.
That is the perplexing thing. For some, DL and ABDL is a fetish, whereas for other (like myself) I hate that insinuation, as I don’t see it as a fetish at all! It’s just a part of myself that enjoys my little side it’s much bigger than just something as a sexual turn on!
So, back to the sissy baby thing…. It appears this too is something with a wide range of interests.
For me, being a sissy baby means I admit to my thought of liking frilly things and such that was so taboo as a literal cowboy while in my boyhood and growing up and now as an adult cowboy. And this interacts with my being little. So things as dresses and little girl clothes are something that occasionally I explore as it is part of this deeper part of myself that is deeper even than my interests in being DL or ABDL. Not something that is always out there in how I feel.
But then while looking out in the vastness of the internet universe, I find that there is a definition of a sissy baby that is immensely different and something that quite frankly is abhorrent to my own self. (I’m not trying to be offensive to those who this might be the case). But there is a genre out there that sees a sissy baby as one who is engaged in humiliation play and is not just submissive, but in a very sexual way. And stories that are written that are not about just engaging in being a little baby who may have been born a boy but also likes girlish things that were forbidden, but into something where someone us sold into human trafficking as a sissy baby for someone else’s pleasure.
To be truthful, seeing this other concept makes me sick and feels like something that should be reported as bordering illegal.
I get that BDSM is its own culture, but some aspects go beyond what I would ever think is part of the community that I feel are folks who are actually little. Rather, it expands into something that I feel should have no connection with being little. They are sexual fetishes about being a boy forced into being a baby girl and then sexual things going and sold into bondage.
Well, for me, that is 180 degrees and completely opposite of what I think of in being a sissy baby girl. It’s not about sex, even though there could be an aspect of that, but not in a fetish way.
Anyhow… this was a way long post and if you are still reading, thanks.
But I am curious if anyone else feels this way, or if I am the sole person that sees being a sissy baby girl as being more about an innocent little girl baby who is actually a boy but needs to be true to these feelings as in comparison to an adult who wears sissy baby clothes and involved in very much “adult” sexual behavior in a sissy baby realm whether heterosexual or gay. But the sexual aspect is more about their identity than the being a little girl.
Thoughts?
So I’ve been feeling quite a bit of my “sissy” side lately and decided to indulge in exploring a few things and a few stories and such, and found that the internet has quite the varied approach to what a sissy baby is.
Don’t get me wrong, this isn’t my first time seeing this, but this last kind of inspection into such made me realize there is a huge difference out there as to what this means.
For me, being a sissy baby still is very innocent and babyish. It isn’t about sex or such, but more being able to be the little girl that I wasn’t able to be biologically, but yet I figured out later in life that there are things there that interest me.
But I have found that more of the visions of this online is more sexual, BDSM, and a very different universe than what I would ever associate with.
Just as there are adult babies and diaper lovers that this interest is not about sex, or maybe very mildly so, there are others for which it may be.
That is the perplexing thing. For some, DL and ABDL is a fetish, whereas for other (like myself) I hate that insinuation, as I don’t see it as a fetish at all! It’s just a part of myself that enjoys my little side it’s much bigger than just something as a sexual turn on!
So, back to the sissy baby thing…. It appears this too is something with a wide range of interests.
For me, being a sissy baby means I admit to my thought of liking frilly things and such that was so taboo as a literal cowboy while in my boyhood and growing up and now as an adult cowboy. And this interacts with my being little. So things as dresses and little girl clothes are something that occasionally I explore as it is part of this deeper part of myself that is deeper even than my interests in being DL or ABDL. Not something that is always out there in how I feel.
But then while looking out in the vastness of the internet universe, I find that there is a definition of a sissy baby that is immensely different and something that quite frankly is abhorrent to my own self. (I’m not trying to be offensive to those who this might be the case). But there is a genre out there that sees a sissy baby as one who is engaged in humiliation play and is not just submissive, but in a very sexual way. And stories that are written that are not about just engaging in being a little baby who may have been born a boy but also likes girlish things that were forbidden, but into something where someone us sold into human trafficking as a sissy baby for someone else’s pleasure.
To be truthful, seeing this other concept makes me sick and feels like something that should be reported as bordering illegal.
I get that BDSM is its own culture, but some aspects go beyond what I would ever think is part of the community that I feel are folks who are actually little. Rather, it expands into something that I feel should have no connection with being little. They are sexual fetishes about being a boy forced into being a baby girl and then sexual things going and sold into bondage.
Well, for me, that is 180 degrees and completely opposite of what I think of in being a sissy baby girl. It’s not about sex, even though there could be an aspect of that, but not in a fetish way.
Anyhow… this was a way long post and if you are still reading, thanks.
But I am curious if anyone else feels this way, or if I am the sole person that sees being a sissy baby girl as being more about an innocent little girl baby who is actually a boy but needs to be true to these feelings as in comparison to an adult who wears sissy baby clothes and involved in very much “adult” sexual behavior in a sissy baby realm whether heterosexual or gay. But the sexual aspect is more about their identity than the being a little girl.
Thoughts?
Last edited: