Nowididit said:
I don't know where you are getting this info on the Little Kings and AlphaGatorZs being thinner on the 2nd batch. So far there have been several batches out and I have ordered from every batch and there is no difference.
From the orders I placed, from an email they sent out and from
this link where they made changes around May. The pack I ordered previously had far denser padding than my current bag. I would say the padding is about half as dense in the new bag. In the email they said they had made the padding lighter and softer with more absorbency.
In the link I posted, they say, "...6750ml is an achievable level of sog!" Even if the diaper were designed better that would be impossible. In fact reaching any diapers ISO by using it like it's intended is not possible. ISO ratings are done by soaking the diaper for a predetermined amount of time, letting it drip "dry", then weighing it. This test completely saturates the entire padding which we would never be able to accomplish due to our anatomy. It also doesn't press out the excess fluids that the diaper is unable to retain.
Another of the changes to the padding is they ditched a lot of the natural fibers and went with a higher ratio of synthetic short strand fibers in the core. Synthetic fibers make it softer and more comfortable but they don't wick or absorb like natural fibers do. The fibers being short doesn't help either. All this is why, if you don't have the diaper tight to your body like it shouldn't be anyway, you get the big ball of expanded SAP between your legs and it leaks. I know what the content of the padding is because I cut them open when I modify them. It's easy to tell what it's made of by pulling a piece out, getting the SAP out and wetting it. Once saturated you press the water out with a folded up paper towel. Synthetic materials will be much drier than the paper towel and fluff back up a bit after pressing. Natural fibers will retain more moisture and stay clumped together.
ABUMichaelUK said:
Have you been complaining about defects or changes to the specification-
Not me - us. Just search ABU on this site and you'll find a whole slew of complaints about both.
ABUMichaelUK said:
When customers get something defective, we will replace it.
The diapers with misplaced tapes weren't replaced and continued to be sold at normal price. This was just one instance but was still unacceptable in my eyes.
Most of the complaints people have about ABU is the constant changes to the specifications of the diapers. The changes that, from an engineering standpoint, make absolutely no sense because they don't actually improve the product. Simply adding more SAP doesn't make sense because the design is already flawed and leaks out the back before the SAP higher up the back can absorb and lock away fluids. Using more synthetic materials makes no sense because synthetics don't wick or absorb anything. Changing the materials of the backsheet and topsheet constantly makes no sense but I'm sure saves the manufacturer because they can just use whatever is laying around. Leakguard material on the SDK is a good case in point when they changed to the dark blue. ABU admitted early on that it wasn't a change they asked for. I could go on for hours typing all the things I have seen from ABU that have slowly turned me away from their products. Even a few people here have quoted my post already agreeing with me.
ABUMichaelUK said:
We cannot open and check every pack of diapers before they go out. Defects happen within production runs affecting a small number of products- it is the same with any manufacturer. When customers get something defective, we will replace it. A number of imrpovements have been implemented on recent runs which will hit stores soon including better tapes, better SAP and tougher tape landing zones- mostly in response to customer feedback.
Of course you can't open them all and check them but there are quality control methods that ABU could request from the manufacturer before a lot is shipped. All this leads me to believe that ABU has absolutely no control over the QC of what comes off the production line. No testing, lot samples for acceptance, etc. That leads me to believe some of these changes to the diapers that ABU touts as improvements is more of the manufacturer telling ABU what they're going to get instead of the other way around.
That is what make ABU's products not worth what we pay for them.