- Messages
- 1,854
- Role
- Adult Baby
That's how the early adult diapers were as well even after infant diapers went to the fitted shape. You can still find some as the "Kendall Ables" diaper.
Interesting, I've never seen a diaper that was advertised as being able to be used as an underpad, as well.willnotwill said:You can still find some as the "Kendall Ables" diaper.
Eclectic said:I wore vintage style Pampers growing up (fanfold). They leaked and messes were also prone to falling out. Early adult disposables were also fanfold with one tab per side (Surecare and Ambeze, to name a few of the brands). They were much thinner than Pampers and prone to leaking and tearing.
I don’t know about others, but I wear diapers to keep in leaks and messes. if you want fanfold, try a cloth prefold and plastic pants, otherwise the disposables available today are way better than those of the 70’s and 80’s.
Seeing that old site brought back memories68Bonnie said:AB Universe had them back in the day, but I guess it was never a big seller. I never tried them.
Hey, check it out! That last photo of an adult in the baby blue T-shirt and fanfold diaper is me! Here's another few shots from that same set just to prove it:dpcare said:I had a Catalog given to me at a medical supply store it was a thin flyer type catalog for Whitestone Medical and on one page it showed the adult Ameze diapers on the opposite page was the Ambeze Junior diapers it showed the package and a boy who looked to be about 10 years old kneeling on one knee and all he had one was n Ambeeze Junior I once saw the same photo of the boy in an ad somewhere I don't remember where I would love to find that ad that was the first time I saw someone older than a Toddler in a disposable diaper
Like them a lot, hope your wife will finally allow you post more pics with your new acquisitions.70sPampers said:Hey, check it out! That last photo of an adult in the baby blue T-shirt and fanfold diaper is me! Here's another few shots from that same set just to prove it:
View attachment 75133View attachment 75134View attachment 75135View attachment 75136
PS. The diapers are vintage 70s fanfold Pampers Toddler size, two or three glued together to fit the 50-year old me!
Fanfolds are the ONLY diapers for me! I have no desire for hourglass diapers with elastic gathers, etc. However, those thin, flimsy Ambeze, SureCare, and other "glorified changing mats that are supposed to pass off as adult diapers" never did anything for my diaper fetish so I took to attaching a few vintage baby sized 70s Toddler Pampers to achieve, for me, what is as authentic a diaper feel as I can. No, the result would probably NOT serve any functional wetting or messing purpose, but then again I NEVER wet or mess my diapers so I am okie-dokie!lonnie said:I for one would love to wear a fan fold diaper made in adult size.
As I have not seen or worn any since 1985.
You are absolutely correct, they where not useful for wetting or messing, but they where the first adult size diapers I got to wear when I started my diaper training.70sPampers said:Fanfolds are the ONLY diapers for me! I have no desire for hourglass diapers with elastic gathers, etc. However, those thin, flimsy Ambeze, SureCare, and other "glorified changing mats that are supposed to pass off as adult diapers" never did anything for my diaper fetish so I took to attaching a few vintage baby sized 70s Toddler Pampers to achieve, for me, what is as authentic a diaper feel as I can. No, the result would probably NOT serve any functional wetting or messing purpose, but then again I NEVER wet or mess my diapers so I am okie-dokie!
Here is what the end result looks like (all photos are high-res so click thumbnail for larger view...)
View attachment 75293View attachment 75294View attachment 75295View attachment 75296View attachment 75297View attachment 75298View attachment 75299View attachment 75300
Freddie07601 said:Today's premium disposable diapers are far more comfortable and keep my clothes, bedding, and furniture dry much more reliably.
Actually, as far as hourglass diapers go, those first line 1978 Huggies (and the early Kimbies that they themselves were modeled after) are the ONLY two non-fanfold diapers that ever caught my interest, and that is because both the 1978 Huggies (as well as the Kimbies) featured the diamond-embossed plastic like 70s Pampers--the feature I HAVE TO HAVE in a diaper. By comparison, from the beginning, Luvs hourglass diapers NEVER had the diamond embossing. The plastic was ALWAYS buttery smooth from the very beginning (something that does nothing for my diaper fetish at all).BabyTweetyBird said:Luvs and Huggies with their hourglass design became the foundation for the modern adult disposable diaper which debuted in the late 1970s.
How about a petition to major ABDL diaper makers to include the «rubberized» plastics in their sposies?70sPampers said:Actually, as far as hourglass diapers go, those first line 1978 Huggies (and the early Kimbies that they themselves were modeled after) are the ONLY two non-fanfold diapers that ever caught my interest, and that is because both the 1978 Huggies (as well as the Kimbies) featured the diamond-embossed plastic like 70s Pampers--the feature I HAVE TO HAVE in a diaper. By comparison, from the beginning, Luvs hourglass diapers NEVER had the diamond embossing. The plastic was ALWAYS buttery smooth from the very beginning (something that does nothing for my diaper fetish at all).
So if an adult diaper company were to at least make hourglass diapers with diamond-embossed plastic (like Pampers, Kimbies, or 1978 Huggies) then I would buy them in a heartbeat!! I don't really need the fanfold design... I just need that damned diamond embossing!!!
View attachment 75381View attachment 75382View attachment 75383View attachment 75384View attachment 75385View attachment 75386View attachment 75387
Looks interesting.dpcare said:ADULT SIZE KIMBIESView attachment 75394
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and third party cookies for purposes such as web analytics.