I am simultaneously excited for the long wait for a more absorbent product, but honestly, it's not a big capacity change - they use 8 oz bottles in their
current Goodnite ad claiming it holds two water bottles. Fair?
So, from 16 oz to 24 oz, but actually 24 oz? Nah. That's only if you can utilize the padding perfectly and pee gently in controlled bursts. It is a step up. If it is a new size with longer leakguards or wider crotch, adding a thin 6.2 oz booster pad might make this a viable option. Oh boy! I hope it has a higher rise.
The $64,000 question is: Why would Kimberly-Clark shell out the money to make this? Looking at the posts, it is probably isn't ABDL folk. Well, here are few thoughts:
1. Maybe this isn't quite a size change as much as using the new advances in thinner diapers that KC debuted in China with the Huggies Super Deluxe, so it's change in SAP and a more rapid absorption product. Which is still good, as it increases the ability for larger bladders to use them. And the new XL is pretty stretchy, so a better SAP (and sadly, thinness, albeit one that swells a great deal) would be good, too. Business-wise, miniaturized diaper cores leads to lighter, thinner diapers (boo!) that are easier to ship, so Kimberly-Clark benefits in competing with Pampers. Might be a tad more expensive. Will this be another ultrathin situation?
2. Increasing share in youth market for diapers - if the product is either in a new "youth pant" size, or all goodnites have more rapid absorption, it can compete with the crummy choices for youth incontinence products. This is good for everybody. Aside from the leak guards, wider crotch and wraparound material, do you really want someone to have to wear papery Prevail Youth Briefs or the like? It's a good strategy.
Well, I look forward to seeing updates!!!