Pampers has been the leader in shrinkflation and making crazy claims like “up to 100% no leaks”. Then Huggies went with it. Now they’re going to size 8. They might be going the shrinkflation route too.SparkyDog said:
Same.patrick1776 said:
The toddler I outlined was wearing an early 2000's Huggies.PatrickABDL said:
www.adisc.org
Has Rascal+Friends recently expanded their size 7? I recall giving them a go initially, and they were identical in size to a 6. Huggies did update the size 7 diapers in the past year to improve their fit, making them wider. While the size 8 might be similar to the early 2000s versions, the current size 7 already offers a wider fit comparable to those. If Huggies were to make the size 8 taller like their 2011-2012 versions of their size 6's and even wider than the old size 6 diapers from the 2000s, that would be a game changer.Joediaper said:The toddler I outlined was wearing an early 2000's Huggies.
What I'm wearing is a modified BetterDry.
There's a link in my post to a thread I made where I created progressively better performing diapers by doing the opposite of what some harp an adult diaper needing like edge to edge padding and more than one tape per side. But I'll go ahead and link it again.
The Engineering Of Adult Diapers and Proof Of Previously Made Claims
In the past few years there have been many discussions on this forum about the construction of adult diapers and how it should be done. I have been involved in several of them and have made some fairly controversial claims about how the current design is totally wrong. Here are a few of them...
I'm not holdng my breath on these new Huggies but there is promise. Especially in what other manufacturers have done. Several have gone longer but not wider and they fell off the shelves. I believe this happened because there are better performing youth products out there.
Pampers only slightly adjusted the length and just used wider stretch panels. Still on shelves but not selling like it should from what I have seen. I haven't seen much though so anyone with any more/better information please chime in.
My favorite, Rascal+Friends, went proportionately wider and longer with their 7 but not by much. People are buying them though and it appears to be a lot too. They seem to be outperforming the competition by a pretty good margin as well. I'm starting to think this is because of the lack of stretchy sides. Stretchy sided diapers just don't seem to be able to keep a good fit even on babies. This could be why Pampers seems to be going to stiffer sides.
If Huggies takes all this in to account they really could turn the market on it's head and come out with a useful size 8 that actually works. But they are the ones that pioneered the current shrinkflated diapers we have on the market today so it most likely will end up being a size 6 from the early 2000's seeing as how the size 7 now is a bit smaller than that if memory serves me right.
I just got my pre-order bumped up to this Saturday. Also I would like to mention originally I was supposed to get my order on the 12th.patrick1776 said:
samepatrick1776 said:
Rascal and friends 7 was super soft and pretty large compared to Luvz 7 and Gentle Steps 7, my points of reference at the time. I had to extend the tapes since there wasn't enough stretch to go around my adult body, but they were very comfy and functional.Joediaper said:The toddler I outlined was wearing an early 2000's Huggies.
What I'm wearing is a modified BetterDry.
There's a link in my post to a thread I made where I created progressively better performing diapers by doing the opposite of what some harp an adult diaper needing like edge to edge padding and more than one tape per side. But I'll go ahead and link it again.
The Engineering Of Adult Diapers and Proof Of Previously Made Claims
In the past few years there have been many discussions on this forum about the construction of adult diapers and how it should be done. I have been involved in several of them and have made some fairly controversial claims about how the current design is totally wrong. Here are a few of them...
I'm not holdng my breath on these new Huggies but there is promise. Especially in what other manufacturers have done. Several have gone longer but not wider and they fell off the shelves. I believe this happened because there are better performing youth products out there.
Pampers only slightly adjusted the length and just used wider stretch panels. Still on shelves but not selling like it should from what I have seen. I haven't seen much though so anyone with any more/better information please chime in.
My favorite, Rascal+Friends, went proportionately wider and longer with their 7 but not by much. People are buying them though and it appears to be a lot too. They seem to be outperforming the competition by a pretty good margin as well. I'm starting to think this is because of the lack of stretchy sides. Stretchy sided diapers just don't seem to be able to keep a good fit even on babies. This could be why Pampers seems to be going to stiffer sides.
If Huggies takes all this in to account they really could turn the market on it's head and come out with a useful size 8 that actually works. But they are the ones that pioneered the current shrinkflated diapers we have on the market today so it most likely will end up being a size 6 from the early 2000's seeing as how the size 7 now is a bit smaller than that if memory serves me right.
DelC said:
DelC said:
they hold a lotI12BLittle89 said:
Iordered 2 cases good thing other wise idd be outPaddedRebel said:
olPadPhilosopher said:
Dormboy said:
My order was originally supposed to arrive on June 14th, but now it's expected to come on Tuesday. However, there's a chance that it might arrive today or tomorrow instead.deepdriftAD said:
You should have held onto your order. The Little Movers I order were non-existent at some point, I proceed with my order. They dispatched my package on the day it was released, I will eventually receive my order.babyjoe698 said:
I had Snug and Dry and switch to little moversN0bu said:
