Yiffstar?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Gingy

Est. Contributor
Messages
2,124
Role
  1. Adult Baby
  2. Sissy
My best friend and I have been exchanging links in a private Facebook thread. He keeps pushing this yiffstar website on me.

It seems similar to furaffinity in the layout and theme areas.. It's a nice site, but it seems a little pedophelliac I'm affraid...

-Pictures of young tigers being f-ed by an older sibling while hugging their plushies and sleeping!?
-he even sent me this one. It's a story about a fox and a cangaroo, who are nine years old, best friends, aaaaand... Suck eachother off....


Strange things in that neck of the woods. I told him it seems a little "unfriendly" and to try some other good sites (gave examples).

Do you think yiffstar is a little... Off? Is it the deeker of furry sites, or what?
 

Raccoon

Est. Contributor
Messages
4,161
Role
  1. Diaper Lover
  2. Diaperfur
No I would not call it the Deeker of furry sites; maybe closer to the stuff "non-nude" will pull up, in that it skirts the cp laws on a technicality, while still showing images meant to fap to.

A little off? Well yes...

I guess there is a debate to be made over whether cub-yiff satisfies a market that would otherwise use live models, or whether it promotes and legitimizes pornographic images of underage persons. Substitute drug or gateway drug?
 
X

xdeadx

Guest
There's a lot of cub art around there >.>

It's mostly full of porn. FA is a lot cleaner.
 

Grutzvalt

Est. Contributor
Messages
1,378
Role
  1. Adult Baby
...Nothin' wrong with a little cub art, its just a drawing. Yiffstar is awesome!!!! The only thing that drives me crazy is trying to use its multiple keyword search, which *never* works.
 

adaffme149

Est. Contributor
Messages
437
Role
  1. Adult Baby
  2. Diaper Lover
  3. Sissy
  4. Other
First off, I'd say it's more of a 'substitute drug', but that's just my opinion of the two. I'd also like to propose another idea, 'a different thing entirely', to some. I gather this alternative response, from considering all other things that would be quite illegal to actually carry out. For example, there are those people who have fantasies for rape/being raped; and even people who role-play that with their consenting partners. These people may fantasize about a rape scenario, but any of them with half a set of morals would never get off on an actual rape scenario taking place. Or, like those into that 'vore' fetish. They may fantasize about being eaten alive/whatever that is exactly about, not too sure, really. I don't really understand it, but that's what I know of it, I think. Either way, they may fantasize about it, but it can't really happen/people don't really do that [well, I can't say nobody, but no good person with morals would]. So, I'd really have to conclude, that this all draws down to a few conclusions. Those would be as follows:
  • I believe that an image, in this case, that of the pornographic nature, does not cause a person to wish to enact something more. If the thought is there, and the will to carry out the thought is there, then a person will do it, no matter what they look at. For instance, murder. Looking at murder pictures does not make you commit murder, I would say. It's a pre-planted notion, not strengthened by images; groups of pixels on a thin sheet of plastic and liquid crystals.
  • I conclude that, whether it is a 'substitute drug' or 'another thing entirely', is based solely on the person and their mental health and personality. There are those that would fantasize about something, but not do it out of fear of consequences/compassion for not hurting the victim[morals], and then there are those that would not carry out the thought in real life, because it is not attractive to them in real life, only in their mind. Thus, the 'another thing entirely' group.
In my personal opinion, I would have to say that I should find the "another thing entirely" group more mentally stable/acceptable, than those who do not do it out of fear or compassion, followed by those that do not do it out of compassion, and then, the most theoretically dangerous ones; those who do not do it out of fear.

I should hope this provides proper insight on my thoughts as relevant to your question. I end my theory here.
 

Scalie

Est. Contributor
Messages
69
Role
  1. Diaper Lover
  2. Babyfur
I like yiffstar, but only for the cool transformation and diaper stories. There are a ton of them that are just really bad, but if you look, you'll find a few good ones.
I'm not into cub porn or anything like it. I really like the age regression type storys that are non-yiff. Stories that usually leave the main character young and needing to be looked after. ^.=.^
 

Lowie

Est. Contributor
Messages
1,992
Role
  1. Adult Baby
  2. Diaper Lover
  3. Babyfur
  4. Diaperfur
  5. Carer
There's a lot of cub art around there >.>

It's mostly full of porn. FA is a lot cleaner.

Yeah until you reach the 18+ age. ;)


I personally don't go to yiffstar.. I did read a friends story he has on there though.
 
Messages
159
Role
  1. Adult Baby
  2. Diaper Lover
  3. Babyfur
to each there own,

but i do enjoy going there to read some of the stories and some art.
 

LilRabbit

Est. Contributor
Messages
409
Role
  1. Babyfur
  2. Diaperfur
  3. Sissy
  4. Incontinent
  5. Carer
Imagine that... porn on a site called YiffStar! Who knew!?

Haha... anyway. I've recently registered there, as I did write a yiff story to upload there (that isn't going to ever be uploaded here). I read a few there, but they weren't all cub yiff stories. Far from it... I saw a good balance between the two.
 
Messages
521
Role
  1. Private
curiousity killed the cat....'s innocence
:[

yiffstar=not my deal...aloong with diaperspace and dailydiapers
>< i gotta stop being curious

furafinity is cute though!
 

WoXxY

Est. Contributor
Messages
452
Role
  1. Adult Baby
  2. Diaper Lover
  3. Babyfur
  4. Incontinent
Chalk that up to yet another reason why I don't look for furry art anymore.
 

Grutzvalt

Est. Contributor
Messages
1,378
Role
  1. Adult Baby
...Are you fucking serious, dude? This is *not* the deeker of fury sites. Anyone can draw porn and post it on *any* website. By your logic (presense of cubs), any website with sexual cub content (Look at the number of results that come up for "cub" search term versus everything else) is a "deeker of the furry sites," or that's what it sounds like. Do that same search on FurAffinity. You will find cub porn there too, Infact, they have an entire sub-category under both normal and mature categories. Don't try to kill a perfectly good site like that, and tell your friend that you don't want to see that.
 

Target

Est. Contributor
Messages
493
Role
  1. Diaper Lover
  2. Babyfur
I have an account on Yiffstar and I like the site, and yes, I noticed there are some of those pics/stories involving cubs. some of them are found in the forum too.

There is another place, e621.net, that, in my opinion, has better quality pics but contains more cub porn pics than yiffstar.

if I recall correctly, many of those pics disappeared from yiffstar along with yiffstar fap section.
 
Messages
591
Role
  1. Diaper Lover
  2. Babyfur
  3. Diaperfur
I've been there, but it doesn't load right for my computer, so I've only visited once or twice. It's really slow. I only like the m/m and m solo sections. I haven't spent enough time on it to even see (or notice) cub artwork.
 

Iggy

Est. Contributor
Messages
320
Role
  1. Adult Baby
  2. Babyfur
  3. Other
  4. Private
I've tried wikifur but it kinda disgresses the question at hand. What exactly does yiff mean?
 

Jimpy

Contributor
Messages
16
Role
  1. Adult Baby
  2. Diaper Lover
  3. Babyfur
I prefer FA, larger community, more clean cub art.

If you call used diaper clean that is! :p
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top