Star quality diapers

[LonelyKitty]

So a few years ago searching around for diapers on the internet I came across a type of diaper not yet mentioned on this site (that I know of). They are called star quality diapers, anyone try them before?

 

[Blacksmith]

others can tell the story better, but basicly the person running the site was a pedo and a creep

 

[Terrorbear]

I have also read numerous reports all over the internet about this company. There have been pleads to anyone who'd care to listen to shut them down due to supposed confirmed child/sex abuse by the owners.

 

[jamiejamie]

Yea, I agree. It was a pretty bad site that sells newsletters of young boys sporting the diapers, underwear, and plastic pants during photo shoots in hotel rooms. There was one time there was a backdoor to view the photos for free and it was pretty uncomfortable.

 

[AnalogRTO]

Several people have found them over the years. The diapers themselves are average quality, nothing special. The price on them is not worth it.

What was noteworthy was that they had a 'catalog' of children sporting their products that sold for a much higher price than the products themselves (over $100USD), with ways that you could order previous editions of the catalog available.

As the children are not nude or in sexual situations, it did not meet the criteria for child pornography, but plenty of people can see just how much it pushes up against that definition. We occasionally see people come here who find the site and have questions about the products, usually once they are informed of the nature of the business, they avoid that place entirely.

TL;DR Back away from that place quietly, then turn around and run like hell.

 

[LonelyKitty]

Yikes didn't know

 

[DiaperTV]

I'm a bit shocked, since star diapers were one of the first ABDL like diapers I found at the web some time ago. It was the first time I saw teenagers in diaper ads. Since they were sold as bedwetter diapers, it sounds reasonable for me that they also use teen models. As they were outside my country, I bought others and never heard from them again.

I have also read numerous reports all over the internet about this company.

So this is proofed? Are there any articles from news papers or something like that, which documents what happened? I searched for star diaper and quality diaper, but couldn't find much. Or have they renamed? Only know them as star diapers. According to the archived site, they also had race car diapers (maybe later?).

 

[dogboy]

They not only used teens but also pre-teens. They also sold a catalogue with many pictures of young boys in diapers and plastic pants. What was really weird was that they'd have a picture of a 13 or 14 year old, diapered and playing with a toddlers toy like a toy fire truck. They were definitely pandering to pedophiles in my humble opinion.

So yes, they were investigated and there are a number of articles on the web which is why I know about their pictures. Also, if you Google Images for pics of diapers, those Star pictures will occasionally show up which is how I saw the diapered boy playing with the toy fire truck.

 

[DiaperTV]

So yes, they were investigated and there are a number of articles on the web which is why I know about their pictures.

Can you please link some or post the query you used? I only found a deviantart blog post from 2016. And one thread in our forum here. According to the thread, the website was shutdown in may 2023. So relatively new, when it was online until a few months. But this second topic also doesn't contain any sources other than the deviantart post, which is discussed for inconsistent information in the screenshots.

I'm wondering why I can't find no articles or other information than those blog posts/forum threads, even with different search terms. Especially when there was an investigation which closed the site. Or the sites, by the research I found that they had more brands like tiger underwear. It seems to be the same business (also targeting kids/young teens), just with pants instead of diapers.

 

[dogboy]

All the drama was years ago so things were current then but apparently not now. It was one of those things that were discussed regularly here on ADISC. I'm sure there are some old discussions but they're probably way back.

 

[DiaperTV]

That wondered me too: I searched also here in the forum and the oldest thread I found was from november 2015. The content was removed by a moderator, so it's not completely clear what exactly this topic was about. It was also closed since the moderator said "it was extensively discussed in the past". According to this post, the site was only until around may 2023? While a lot of people just here knows that they're involved in illegal things since at least 2015?

I had a look in the diapers sub forum, it has 1142 pages, starting at January 2015. Since it must be before november 2015, I looked around those threads from the last one back to page 1078 where the thread above was posted. I looked at the titles, opened some threads with less speaking names like "question" or similar, but found nothing more regarding this topic. Using the search, I found another topic, where tiger underwear was posted and someone explained that they're involved in kids models and trouble with photos. Hard to find more, since there are no topics mention exactly star diapers. And searching through posts leads to a massive amount of other completely unrelated stuff, where people talking about things like star motives on a diaper.

Seems like an interesting idea for an education/documentation post, but what I still got seems too thin to accuse them in good conscience for being a child porn content creator taking pictures of those boys for questionable purposes which may goes in the direction of pedophila, since there seems nearly no evidence than having young boys on their advertise pictures, where we don't even know for sure if they're teens or kids. On Pornhub for comparison, we have a research of the New York Times contacting victims, checking their stories, people investigating if the site doesn't care to take down illegal content like underaged or reverse porn and much more. So it's proved that PH did not enough and instead misused the illegal content from the victims to earn more money.

 

[AnalogRTO]

That wondered me too: I searched also here in the forum and the oldest thread I found was from november 2015. The content was removed by a moderator, so it's not completely clear what exactly this topic was about. It was also closed since the moderator said "it was extensively discussed in the past". According to this post, the site was only until around may 2023? While a lot of people just here knows that they're involved in illegal things since at least 2015?

I had a look in the diapers sub forum, it has 1142 pages, starting at January 2015. Since it must be before november 2015, I looked around those threads from the last one back to page 1078 where the thread above was posted. I looked at the titles, opened some threads with less speaking names like "question" or similar, but found nothing more regarding this topic. Using the search, I found another topic, where tiger underwear was posted and someone explained that they're involved in kids models and trouble with photos. Hard to find more, since there are no topics mention exactly star diapers. And searching through posts leads to a massive amount of other completely unrelated stuff, where people talking about things like star motives on a diaper.

Seems like an interesting idea for an education/documentation post, but what I still got seems too thin to accuse them in good conscience for being a child porn content creator, since there seems nearly no evidence than having young boys on their advertise pictures, where we don't even know for sure if they're teens or kids. On Pornhub for comparison, we have a research of the New York Times contacting victims, checking their stories, people investigating if the site doesn't care to take down illegal content like underaged or reverse porn and much more. So it's proved that PH did not enough and instead misused the illegal content from the victims to earn more money.

I looked at their web site and items they sold back many years ago. Legally, they did not engage in child pornography, but they certainly tried to skate close to the line. Their products were not sold at that reasonable of a price, so they didn't do a lot of business in underwear or diapers.

What they did do was to have catalogs of their products with teens and younger children modeling them. No, that isn't illegal, but when you look at what they offered, there was no reason to have large catalogs with just a handful of products, nor is there a reason to SELL these catalogs at a ridiculous price or to offer to sell prior catalogs.

They did not create child pornography per se, but they certainly seemed less intent on selling diapers or underwear compared to selling pictures of young boys in nothing but their products. No, these were not sexual situations that these young models were in, nor were they showing genitalia. However, the overwhelming opinion of people was that you didn't need a 100-page catalog of photos to sell one style of diaper; this was about selling the pictures and skate along the edge of legality.

 

[DiaperTV]

I'd not use the amount of pictures itself as being suspicious, if just the product (diaper/underwear) is sold.

nor is there a reason to SELL these catalogs at a ridiculous price or to offer to sell prior catalogs.

But that is something other. When a catalog of the pictures itself is sold, the product is not the diaper/underpants any more. Instead, the picture is the product. This is definitely questionable for me. Even when there only were non-sexual pictures in the catalog. This was my misunderstanding why I wrote child porn, I thought that this catalog contains pornographic content.

Was there any public offer for that catalog, like they wrote on their homepage that it's sold for XX dollar as prove?

No, these were not sexual situations that these young models were in, nor were they showing genitalia.

Thank you for your post, now it seems that I get the point: People noticed star diapers sell picture collections of their models in diapers/underwear. There is no evidence that hey're involved in the misuse of underage persons, but since they sell pictures with little cloths, it is obvious that the customers of the catalog are into kids. Anyway I see no other reason why people would buy them. This also explains, why the shop seems to be online for years: It's morally questionable and can be heavy discussed, but not illegal. And why the underwear shop is still online.

This makes the situation difficult for the ABDL scene. Even when it's legal and no child pornography was produced, this confirms prejudices that ABDL is near to pedophile or even automatically connected. That's not good and harms the entire community.

 

[AnalogRTO]

Was there any public offer for that catalog, like they wrote on their homepage that it's sold for XX dollar as prove?

There were several locations on their web page that you could go to order their catalog (and the price for it was not just a few $, it was ~$100 IIRC), as well as order previous catalogs. In all honesty, why would someone running a legitimate business be selling catalogs at such a ridiculous markup, not to mention having older catalogs for sale as well?

Again, it's not illegal as the pictures were not sexual in nature and the models did have genitalia covered, but it was easy to realize that this was trying to be a soft version of kiddie porn.

 

[dogboy]

Like the old expression, where's there's smoke, there's fire.

 

[DiaperTV]

There were several locations on their web page that you could go to order their catalog (and the price for it was not just a few $, it was ~$100 IIRC), as well as order previous catalogs.

Totally agree, this is suspicious. I found an old version of the qualitydiapers website by an archiving service, which seems to work. I'll have a deeper look at it to find the page where those catalog is advertised. Based on the results, I'll consider making a video to work off this topic in a way that we had this questionable site, but without illegal pornographic material and that the large majority of ABDL doesn't seem to be involved in those things.

It's also the first and only time I heard that someone produces such material inside our scene, which seems to targeting pedophiles systematically as some kind of network.