Sorry I skipped Russell Pine, or Jordan Maxwell. I didn't think that including a con artist would be right. I am surprised you included him, or didn't you know that about him?
Federal Trade Commission, Plaintiff, v. Jordan Maxwell, also known as Russell Pine, individually and doing business as BBCOA aka BBC of America aka Better Books and Cassettes of America; and Vic Varjabedian aka Victor Varjabedian aka Varouj Varjabedi
As for calling them conspiracy theorists, what else would call someone that believe that there is a vast conspiracy running the world, controlling all the governments, religions, economies, everything. They have no proof, just their claims which are either made up or twisted versions of facts to support whatever they made up.
If any of these people had degrees in anything related to what they are "studying" don't you think they would put them in their own biographies? I certainly would.
The Official Graham Hancock Website
Zecharia Sitchin You might want to check out this site, by someone that actually has a PhD in the appropriate area of study.
As for the extremist, why should I discount one extremist to believe another? My point was thought that Micheal Tsarion threatened someone with physical violence for saying he was a Mason and other things. Why would I take that person seriously?
First of all i want to apologize to everyone for my last comment i just kindda got a little too pissed. I expect people to question my ideas but it doesn't mean u have knock everything i say. But dont call this a "silly" topic. Theres nothing silly wanting to question how ancient texts are interrupted by the everyday scholars we hear about. Its important to be educated on your past and know a little bit about your ancestors and always question them for yourself.
But anyways Valentine i appreciate the link, i downloaded the PDF files for the comparisons. I do see the authors point that hes trying to make and he does a very good job good comparing sitchins theories to his own. I do believe Sitchin doesn't interpret all the symbols right but im sorry thats certainly hard to say that theres no sun in the middle and its actually a star. And the different size dots are not the planets. The reason i have a problem with that theory is one he talks about that the Sumerian's had a dictionary to go along with there symbols but he never shows any evidence of the "Orginal stone dictionary" just the modern paper one. So what im asking u is if Zecharia sitchin did miss translate the symbols isnt it possible this guy did too? They both could be wrong because they both dont show the actual dictionary. So how do we know what the sun symbol is for ourselves? But the comparison does make me wonder if sitchins translated the other symbols correctly so he might be wrong about the whole rest of the story. But as far as the 12 planets carving i defiantly believe thats a solar system the dots are different sizes. i can see that with my own eyes. so i don't believe they are stars cant believe that one sorry. Ive seen modern pictures of our modern day solar system and when compared to this carving it matches exactly. Also NASA has been looking for another planet because when they found out Pluto wasn't really a planet they found that it was weird there was still a major gravitational pulling on our solar system, something big. So NASA is even looking for planet X and believe it defiantly exist that is not controversial at all im sure u could find on the news or NASA site itself. Also he doesn't talk about sitchins translations when the Sumerian's are supposedly talking about the different colors of the planets with great detail. I don't see how they could of known what color they were unless they were in space looking at them thereselves. And might i add we only found most of our planets we have today over the past 200 years. So if the Sumerian's knew about them thats about 6000 years before us pretty god damn amazing if u ask me. I thank u for being the only one here to argue a good point.
As far as micheal tsarion being violent towards that extremist Christian i dont blame him one bit. That guys an asshole who cares, im sure he attacked him right away accusing him as a bullshiter, he had it coming. Its not like he actually got in a physical fight with him it was on the internet, big deal. Who cares if hes a mason my uncle and grandfather are masons. Doesn't make me think any less of him.
Yeah ok maybe thats true about jordan maxwell but did u see the video and how he describes every day symbols? Thats what i want u to look at because it doesn't matter what jordan maxwell says. You could ignore his whole speech if u wanted to but when he explains what they mean u get a pretty good gut instinct hes right. Because there images are not words otherwise a universal language everyone can understand. Just look at that part and when u go out shopping, u go to mcdonalds really look at those symbols very carefully and tell me what they mean to u? And belive me that will really open your mind.
I have one last question for u. You say alot of my arguments are not fact and maybe your right. But one thing, you had to get your knowledge from school books and dictionary's, u weren't there when they wrote those books up. How do u know what there teaching is just as inaccurate as where im getting my information. Believe me i got A's in history and anthropology i know what the school version is and find more flaws with there opinions. People once thought the earth was flat and that was what was taught back then. Facts, education, science, and theory's change all the time. Your information isn't set in stone either your relying on them giving u accurate information just as much as i think these researchers are. Especially what they teach u in school about archeology and the dating methods they use. i hate to break it to u but alot of dating techniques have now been thought to be highly inaccurate. and there methods of doing it are very questionable to me. The whole evolution time frame makes as much sense as what im talking about. So its possible we know absolutely nothing, since we both get all are information from school and the internet. But one thing we both have is eyes that we can see for ourselves symbols and pictures more powerful than anything school or the internet can teach u.