They're already serving a very niche market.
Both true, but they could still use furry cartoon-style characters without having to pay for Simba or Balto. Admittedly, it wouldn't be quite the same. However, the artwork could be babyish enough for non-furry AB/DLs, to avoid dividing the market.Not gonna happen. It costs millions to buy licensing for characters.
Clearly, it would be a bad idea for a number of reasons. It would divide their market, it would require a high tooling investment, it wouldn't seal around furry tails, it would be the wrong size and in the wrong place much of the time, most furry tails aren't urine-proof or washable, etc.Wouldn't that kind of defeat the purpose of a diaper...If you used the diaper with some fake tail, it could ruin it.
What? An idea? No, my friend, this is REALITY. You see, back a long time ago Bambino got Banned-bino from the Disney Corporation. They were the best workers though so as a Banned Package they got rights to every Disney Character - past, future, and present. Then they dug up Disney's body and they decided only 1950 to future. Therefore they already exist. This extremely important addition to Bambino seems to be the best logical step in the right direction, and that is how the free market stay afloat!Its an idea.