Does Dilbert look like he is wearing a diaper?

Status
Not open for further replies.
DLGrif

DLGrif

Est. Contributor
Messages
435
Role
  1. Diaper Lover
  2. Babyfur
Tighty-whiteys. Yes there are two lines that look like wetness indicators, but it's decidedly not puffy, and there are no tapes, or even lines on the sides. What I'm wondering is why you'd think it's a diaper, when the joke is on the fact he's more or less naked.

That's not how Scott Adams rolls :p
 
B

Butterfly Mage

Guest
No. I think the two lines are the stitching that underwear for males always have. It it was a diaper, you'd see tapes (disposable) or pins (cloth).
 
Hex

Hex

Est. Contributor
Messages
1,142
Role
  1. Adult Baby
  2. Diaper Lover
  3. Babyfur
  4. Sissy
[font="Calibri,Arial"]Theyre unusually drawn briefs(usually drawn as y-fronts) but still definetly briefs.[/font]
 
R

recovery

Est. Contributor
Messages
1,163
Role
  1. Other
I tend to like reading Dilbert comics, But I don't think it's a diaper. And I would agree with pojo, don't look to much into it. Why the hell would it be a diaper? There is very little in the article to suggest it's part of the joke!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top