- Messages
- 399
- Role
- Adult Baby
- Diaper Lover
- Babyfur
- Diaperfur
I have somewhat recently started writing something on Fet life. Before a family member passed away I was going to post the first edit. I will explain more of that in an update on my "Diaper Training," blog. This is the question.
How realistic should art be for things like diaper changes and those innocent moments of no cloths?
A lot of you are probably thinking "Fur." That is what its for. In the pony fandom there is a tuft of fur where those normal parts are. However, I have gotten to thinking about illustrating vulnerability. In figure drawing this idea of nudity is suppose to illustrate vulnerability or very strong emotions in general. Even sorrow is a strong emotion when a figure is posed without cloths. So, if artist of the past took a great deal of consideration to the human figure then why not fur covered characters? Mind you this takes a great deal of careful consideration due to our cultures negativ stigmas.
My take on it is more practical then a release of emotions. If you read my piece "Raining on the Inside," you will probably have noticed. If not I will post it here soon in the story section. I really want art to go with it. Hints the question. My first initial thought is to try and hint at shapes of these body parts, but to do so without drawing too much attention to it from the veiwers perspective. Via the 3 qourters of a page and other types of perspective to make the over all realease of depression and anxiety be replaced by the feeling of safety and child like love. This is really what I want to illustrate in my artwork and is the whole reason I am going such far lenghs to learn human figure drawing.
How realistic should art be for things like diaper changes and those innocent moments of no cloths?
A lot of you are probably thinking "Fur." That is what its for. In the pony fandom there is a tuft of fur where those normal parts are. However, I have gotten to thinking about illustrating vulnerability. In figure drawing this idea of nudity is suppose to illustrate vulnerability or very strong emotions in general. Even sorrow is a strong emotion when a figure is posed without cloths. So, if artist of the past took a great deal of consideration to the human figure then why not fur covered characters? Mind you this takes a great deal of careful consideration due to our cultures negativ stigmas.
My take on it is more practical then a release of emotions. If you read my piece "Raining on the Inside," you will probably have noticed. If not I will post it here soon in the story section. I really want art to go with it. Hints the question. My first initial thought is to try and hint at shapes of these body parts, but to do so without drawing too much attention to it from the veiwers perspective. Via the 3 qourters of a page and other types of perspective to make the over all realease of depression and anxiety be replaced by the feeling of safety and child like love. This is really what I want to illustrate in my artwork and is the whole reason I am going such far lenghs to learn human figure drawing.