Another Diaper Fetish Study

Status
Not open for further replies.
S

soren456

Guest
Something is real familiar about this. It's not new.

I think this is a study that was hijacked by diaper lovers, and the writer was too credulous to see it.

Essentially, the results are crap.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

mizzycub

Est. Contributor
Messages
1,615
Role
  1. Adult Baby
  2. Diaper Lover
  3. Babyfur
Interesting, but to be honest I didn't find it that suprising. Nice to know that some people do proper research relating to these sort of things though. I think some DL hijacking may have taken place - but also look at it logically. If someone has to wear diapers and is the right personality set to become a *B/DL they are more likely to do so. Also, they are more likely to be comfortable with diapers if they have to use them, even if they aren't *B/DL. To top it off, people don't like new things, so if they are used to wearing diapers, they might not want to try something new.

I would say that there might have been some DL hijacking as soren put it, but that there are a number of valid reasons for these results as well, with someone who wears diapers being more likely to be a *BDL one, but by no means the only, possible reason.
 
A

annierighthurr

Guest
:smile:

You mean a Deeker "survey."

Hahaha.

It's sad that the results are definitely skewed by ABDLs. I guess that's something that the researcher would never have taken into consideration, though.
 

Diapered Rabbit

Est. Contributor
Messages
1,027
Role
  1. Adult Baby
  2. Diaper Lover
:bunny: This study done in 2002, regardless how skewed the results, suggest buying stock in companies that manufacture adult diapers may be a sure bet for the next few decades. Lots of people like the secure feeling diapers give them and don't want to give them up! :bunny:
 
Messages
334
Role
  1. Adult Baby
  2. Diaper Lover
  3. Carer
Bad Survey, Bad Conclusions

:educate:As a social scientist by profession, I can tell you that internet surveys are notorious for self-selection bias, and the sampling bias and validity issues, both internal and external are immeasurable. I'm surprised this study was published.

I suspect the results were skewed by AB/TB/DLs. Regardless though, the researcher draws an erroneous conclusion by stating that infantlisim and diaper fetishes should be considered a "cause" of incontinence. With the exception of those ABDLs who are incontinent or who purposefully lose control, voiding is voluntary, and therefore not incontinence. I doubt many ABDLs would present themselves to a doctor for treatment unless they derived sexual pleasure from so doing. This likewise does not constitute incontinence.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top