I don’t understand

Status
Not open for further replies.
Alexia said:
no, you don't get what i'm trying to say. a lot of people here geniuniely believe that everyone respects that rule. i remember seeing a thread where someone asked how hard was it for the underage members to wait until their 18th birthday when that rule became a thing. i just couldn't believe what i was reading

I disagree.

I don't think anyone here believes that EVERY member on ADISC is over 18 just because they entered an 18+ birth year or check a box.

However, it does give ADISC a bit a legal protection. Moo is also quick to block those members that 'out' themselves.

To the original question: I also think this is a good idea. I like the fact that this site keeps the posts to the PG13 rule.
 
I like the PG13 rating. You have to make the site entry 18+ because inherently having a kink related site cannot involve minors. But the posting shouldn't be R or higher because I've been on plenty of ABDL sites that allow that kind of thing, and they all get very same-y, all get very ubiquitous in honestly pretty gross stuff just drowning out the useful posts.

I come here for support and positivity with regard to diaper usage. This site is unique in that you can get Incontinence support that isn't focused solely on how horrible our lives are with it, and actually presents me with threads that are actually useful. It's also unique in that you can get ABDL support that isn't entirely dominated by porn and sex. Not that either of those things are necessarily bad per se, but there are plenty of sites for them if that's what you're after, and that this one is not is at least in part a product of the balance struck by these rules, imo.
 
Last edited:
Personally I am grateful for it... I sent my wife here to get the download and everyone was so supportive and informative. While many use diapers for their intended purpose, there are many that choose to use them for sexual gratification as well.

We are not naive to your plight, but are thrilled to not have it shoved in the faces of someone new to this lifestyle, as this forum is intended to invite all to the wonderful world of diapered life, and to be informative.

Certainly power to you mate! If you have sexual extracurriculars. A clean forum allows people from all walks access to informative material that may not be so keen on recieving sexually charged conveyances.
 
Meh. I have no problem with adisc not catering specifically to people that are hyper-sexual when it comes to ABDL.

I've been around tbdl/abdl's a LONG time, and the people that are wildly, overtly sexual about it are the ones that most consistently give us a bad name. There's nothing wrong with a kink, at all, but in my experience--there's a lot of ABDL's further along the spectrum of sexuality (when it comes to ADBL) that are just plain nuts. Besides, overly sexual ABDL sites are a dime a dozen these days, there is NO shortage of that kind of thing. Whereas 'support' based places like adisc are increasingly rare.

As to the OP's question---I would assume the PG13 is a leftover from the days when Adisc had a large teen community, and 13+ folks were still welcome on the site.
 
Last edited:
That't how I've always read the 'PG-13', teens used to be allowed, but then there were issues. Moo never saw a point to raising the limit (and I don't really see one either).

I really think that if this site turned into one of those where every other post was someone describing their diaper state in gruesome detail, showing pictures of their diaper-crotch and talking about wanking...I would leave. No questions asked. It's why I'm not on any of the more adult-oriented ABDL sites. I don't connect to that part of things, so it doesn't concern me.
 
Dan09 said:
Meh. I have no problem shunning the people that are hyper-sexual when it comes to ABDL.

I've been around tbdl/abdl's a LONG time, and the people that are wildly, overtly sexual about it are the ones that most consistently give us a bad name.

Really? Because the people that participate in obviously biased documentaries and talk shows are pretty much always adamant that it's not sexual (nobody ever believes them, though), and those who are exhibitionists about AB/DL love using the excuse that it's a "lifestyle" to them.
 
Carlson said:
I don’t understand why adisc has a PG 13+ rule flr it’s posts when it’s an 18+ website. Why do they completely ignore the entire sexual culture of the ABDL spectrum. This is such a bad website, and this is why it will eventually not be able to fund itself. they shun half of the community and lose so many potential people on this website.

Which planet are you from???
 
I think there's a fair bit of confusion and misunderstanding as to what "PG-13" actually means.

As I understand it (correct me if I'm wrong!), Moo's intention is that the site remains, first-and-foremost, a support site where people can have mature discussions about AB/DL/IC matters.

The PG-13 policy isn't supposed to stifle discussions on the sexual side of things, it's there to make keep titillating or pornographic content off the site, as there are plenty of "adult" ABDL sites who cater for that.

Personally, I think calling this a "PG-13" policy is a bit confusing for newbies who aren't familiar with the "de facto" standards of the site, but it's hard to think of any better phrase.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HoganBunny
I can understand why there is an age limit on this site. I'm not underage (I'm 19), but I would've definitely been one of the ones who came on here with a bogus age as a minor, not for anything sexual, but for acceptance. Unfortunately, there are trolls and perverts on all sites, even ones that have nothing to do with anything sexual. As for the 18+ page on porn sites, that doesn't do shit. I was on those sites at ten, and all I had to do was lie about my birthday or check the little box and I was in. I specifically remember that in an attempt to throw off PornHub I said that I was born in 1987 when creating my account (instead of being exactly 18 years old, which I thought would look suspicious); my real year is 1999, and the account was made in 2009. The need for acceptance can be exploited very easily, and children can fall into the traps of predators posing as sweet caring people. You can think you're talking to another little or possibly to a Mommy or a Daddy, and it's really just some creep out to take advantage of a minor sexually. It's easy to circumvent age limits, but they're there for a reason.

As for the content, why do you think I'm here? Every other site is an assortment of crotch shots, pictures and videos of people peeing and pooping in their diapers (usually in an exaggerated fashion), and much worse. ("Much worse" depends on who you're asking, but I'm sure there's something on your mind that just irritates you when you think of the other sites.) I think there should be a compromise of sorts: if it's going to get dirty, indicate it in the title or save it for PMs. If we're all being civilized and a "much worse" occurs, it's not going to impress me or turn me on, it's just going to piss me off. And I think I speak for everyone on here when I say that.
 
Requiring members to self-certify that they are 18 or older is not for the member's protection, it is for the site's legal protection.

Since the site advertises itself as adults only, requires members to certify that they are adults, and removes members when it becomes obvious that they have lied about their age, the site and its managers have reasonable legal protection.

It is the litigious nature of the U.S. that caused this site to remove all under-age members and establish an age requirement.
 
howiebabe said:
Requiring members to self-certify that they are 18 or older is not for the member's protection, it is for the site's legal protection.

Since the site advertises itself as adults only, requires members to certify that they are adults, and removes members when it becomes obvious that they have lied about their age, the site and its managers have reasonable legal protection.

It is the litigious nature of the U.S. that caused this site to remove all under-age members and establish an age requirement.

"We're not worried about you suing us, we're worried about your parents suing us." (and that's something you have NO control over, and can happen totally against your wishes)
 
Alexia said:
no, you don't get what i'm trying to say. a lot of people here geniuniely believe that everyone respects that rule. i remember seeing a thread where someone asked how hard was it for the underage members to wait until their 18th birthday when that rule became a thing. i just couldn't believe what i was reading

A lot of people here are way to believing for their own goods sadly, I shudder at the thoughts of how they react to urgent pleas from Nigerian princes in their email accounts about money laundering.
 
Carlson said:
I don’t understand why adisc has a PG 13+ rule flr it’s posts when it’s an 18+ website. Why do they completely ignore the entire sexual culture of the ABDL spectrum. This is such a bad website, and this is why it will eventually not be able to fund itself. they shun half of the community and lose so many potential people on this website.

We've been around for over 10 years now. Moo knows the $$$ side of things better than I do, but I think we're doing just fine.

We definitely aren't shunning sexual ABDLs nor suppressing all sexual topics, though. (My ABDL side is both sexual and non-sexual, and I'm certainly not the only one here.) We just keep the discussions focused on support, not fapping.

Tiny wrote an excellent post explaining what the PG-13 rule means ...

tiny said:
I think there's a fair bit of confusion and misunderstanding as to what "PG-13" actually means.

As I understand it (correct me if I'm wrong!), Moo's intention is that the site remains, first-and-foremost, a support site where people can have mature discussions about AB/DL/IC matters.

The PG-13 policy isn't supposed to stifle discussions on the sexual side of things, it's there to make keep titillating or pornographic content off the site, as there are plenty of "adult" ABDL sites who cater for that.

As an example, here's a post that focused on sexual-related issues without breaking the rules. That thread discusses sexual matters, but its focus is on support - not on swapping sex stories.
 
MeTaLMaNN1983 said:
The only things that need to be changed are Azie and MetalBab.

I've fixed that for you. :)
 
Last edited:
I've met a couple of people who purposely avoid all contact with anyone under age. Just for -their own- protection.

I'm not crazy, I know people lie about their age, even here. But the difference is that when you have adults interacting with minors things get really tricky really fast. Like having a fifteen year old ask about 'butt stuff'. You have a really hard time explaining it online, not because the question is difficult, but because you're thirty and they're fifteen and in different areas, that makes them underage. And your informative post explaining things to them can be construed as sexual, even if you had no intentions beyond clarifying things they were already asking about. In some places it's fifteen, some places it's sixteen, and even then there are places where eighteen is the 'magic number'. That's part of the trouble. The 'age of consent' varies so widely that it's best to just err on the side of being too high.

So you end up with the magic solution of cranking DOWN the content rating level and cranking UP the age restrictions. Maybe not ideal for everyone, but I really think it's the best solution at the moment. (And probably in the future, too, unless they start chipping people like they do dogs. And you have to scan your chip to log-in to websites. LOL Then you can't lie about your age. But then, someone will invent an app to change your information. XD)
 
Last edited:
CuddleWoozle said:
I've met a couple of people who purposely avoid all contact with anyone under age. Just for -their own- protection.

I'm not crazy, I know people lie about their age, even here. But the difference is that when you have adults interacting with minors things get really tricky really fast. Like having a fifteen year old ask about 'butt stuff'. You have a really hard time explaining it online, not because the question is difficult, but because you're thirty and they're fifteen and in different areas, that makes them underage. And your informative post explaining things to them can be construed as sexual, even if you had no intentions beyond clarifying things they were already asking about. In some places it's fifteen, some places it's sixteen, and even then there are places where eighteen is the 'magic number'. That's part of the trouble. The 'age of consent' varies so widely that it's best to just err on the side of being too high.

So you end up with the magic solution of cranking DOWN the content rating level and cranking UP the age restrictions. Maybe not ideal for everyone, but I really think it's the best solution at the moment. (And probably in the future, too, unless they start chipping people like they do dogs. And you have to scan your chip to log-in to websites. LOL Then you can't lie about your age. But then, someone will invent an app to change your information. XD)

The funny thing about that is its the exact opposite with me. Kids will run away if I somehow get close to them. I never intend to hurt children, I'm just going about my own business. They are just scared of a large bearded guy walking down the street.
 
Onesieman said:
The funny thing about that is its the exact opposite with me. Kids will run away if I somehow get close to them. I never intend to hurt children, I'm just going about my own business. They are just scared of a large bearded guy walking down the street.

A guy with a big beard on the street = terrifying

BUT

A guy with a big beard sneaking into their house in December = EXCITE

*shrugs*
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top