- Messages
- 34
- Role
- Adult Baby
- Diaper Lover
- Little
Would you rather being regressed into a baby forever or being shrinked into baby size temporary (3-5 years)?
BabyDenise said:If those are the only choices, I would take the temporary one. I like too many adult things to give them up permanently and, for me, being a baby forever would get very boring.
I would prefer to regress into a baby for a specific situation or time-frame (for example for the next 2 hours) instead of the two choices you mentioned.
Poofybutt said:I'm in agreement with BabyDenise here, neither of those options seems very ideal.
Being regressed into a baby forever would get rather dull and this is coming from someone who goes full-blown baby when he regresses.
Being shrunk down to baby size would be a good option, but not to the size of 3-5 years, that's more of a toddler or young child size, if it was actual baby size like 1 or under I would say that would be a slightly better choice.
If a third option was possible, I would go with something similar to what BabyDenise has suggested, the ability to regress back into infancy for a certain time period, like a few hours or a day or something.
omg - YES, I would re-arrange some real important things, hahhaha, yeeeess!!!!littlemoosey said:If I can pick my mommy, Ill take the temporary, 3-5 and then back to big me.