Diaper sighting in my living room

Status
Not open for further replies.
Good lord.... You guys are overreacting. I would consider it normal to notice something like that. That said it would be creepy if he sat there and stared at her crotch for the rest of the night.
 
BOXERSORBRIEFS said:
Good lord.... You guys are overreacting. I would consider it normal to notice something like that. That said it would be creepy if he sat there and stared at her crotch for the rest of the night.

Agreed. It looks like this was just an observation, not an obsession.
 
BOXERSORBRIEFS said:
Good lord.... You guys are overreacting. I would consider it normal to notice something like that. That said it would be creepy if he sat there and stared at her crotch for the rest of the night.
Yes, he did the right thing bringing it here where it won't harm anyone to get it off his chest. Now we can all discuss it and forget it and the son and his girlfriend are safe from any reactions that could have happened if he hadn't brought it to his support group first. It really isn't important why she wears, what is important is that she doesn't get embarrassed about her mishap and her feelings have a negative impact on the relationships with son or the father.

Sent from my LGL31L using Tapatalk
 
Yeah but my guess is that now that he knows that his son’s girlfriend may possibly be wearing something that’s tied to his own sexual fetish, more than likely he’ll be looking even harder the next time she comes over.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
What bothers me are two things. I would never look up the skirt of either of my son's wives and I most definitely wouldn't say "yea for me" and especially, "super yea for me." That's why it sounds creepy to me. I would have immediately diverted my eyes, and I probably would have been looking up, not down. Yes, this is a girl friend, not a wife, but what's the difference.
 
Before you crazy kids get all freaked out let me clarify a couple things:
1. Her skirt was very short
2. Her pull up was very visable
3. I wasn't searching for it - it was just there
4. I did not stare - I saw it and as soon as realized what I was looking at I turned away.
5. I said "super yay for me" because seeing another adult wearing a diaper means I/we are not too far out on the fringe of society and there's more of us than I think we all realize.
5. I will never discuss this with her or my son.
6. I'm not going to be stalking her looking for diaper "clues" in the future.
7. I'm a guy....and when a situation presents itself to catch a glimpse at certain portions of females anatomy I like most guys will take a quick peek...especially one like this that was near impossible to not see. This was the "yay for me"
8. For a group of folks who are on a website that is specific to a set of fringe fetishes ya-all are pretty quick to assume and just a little judgemental.
9. Relax.
 
Bokeh said:
Yeah but my guess is that now that he knows that his son’s girlfriend may possibly be wearing something that’s tied to his own sexual fetish, more than likely he’ll be looking even harder the next time she comes over.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Whoa, slow down. Where did you get she wears a diaper as part of a sexual fetish? It's more likely she might be a dl. Even more likely still she was just wearing one because of a period.
 
Slomo said:
Whoa, slow down. Where did you get she wears a diaper as part of a sexual fetish? It's more likely she might be a dl. Even more likely still she was just wearing one because of a period.
You misunderstand, I wasn't speculating on why she wears diapers. I was referring to the OP being DL to explain why he's so exited about seeing his attractive daughter-in-law wearing a diaper and the reason he may be more prone to look again.

I have come to understand the term DL to generally refer to someone with a diaper fetish. While I understand this is not always the case, I felt that the OP's excitement of the situation was in regards to that fact. If I am out of line then I retract my statement, I was just explaining how I perceived the situation.
 
SnowBlitz said:
I think this registers a solid 5.5 on the creep-o-meter.

10/10 for me imo. Ya don't just go looking up people's skirts that aint right. I mean unless its deliberate like porn made for that where the person consents or something.
 
When a woman wears a mini skirt it is because she wants you to look at her body. Same goes for a low cut shirt.
Now if she was wearing a ankle length skirt, and you put a camera under it while she was standing up, that is creepy.
At some point in time we started to inflict this false modesty narrative that says all women are feminists, and do not want men looking at the.
The truth is some woman want to be looked at, some women like voyeurism, some women even seek out sexual attention at work to try and further their careers.
I do not buy the false narrative of the me too junk, and when I see a mini skirt, or shorts so short that panties are showing, it is because they want men to look.
If a 50 year old is checking out a 30 something, there is nothing wrong with that.
Do not believe everything the media spoon feeds you.
 
Bokeh said:
You misunderstand, I wasn't speculating on why she wears diapers. I was referring to the OP being DL to explain why he's so exited about seeing his attractive daughter-in-law wearing a diaper and the reason he may be more prone to look again.

I have come to understand the term DL to generally refer to someone with a diaper fetish. While I understand this is not always the case, I felt that the OP's excitement of the situation was in regards to that fact. If I am out of line then I retract my statement, I was just explaining how I perceived the situation.

Nope. DL means "Diaper Lover". This quite literally someone who is compelled to love diapers. Fetishes, by definition, are purely sexual in nature. Any diaper fetish is based on sexuality, (SD for sexual diapers). The two are mutually exclusive, and nowhere mean the same thing.
 
Yeah, I get it, a sexual fetish refers to something that must be present for the fetishist to get off. The term diaper fetish by definition only refers to people who have to have diapers in order to reach sexual release.

The term DL is less restrictive in that it does not exclusively mean a diaper fetishist as many of us may receive sexual pleasure from diapers without it being a fetish & even others may not get anything sexual from it at all. I was using the term fetish loosely, not by its literal definition from the psychology handbook. DL can be used to describe those who are aroused by diapers so that was not necessarily a stretch.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Bokeh said:
Yeah, I get it, a sexual fetish refers to something that must be present for the fetishist to get off. The term diaper fetish by definition only refers to people who have to have diapers in order to reach sexual release.

The term DL is less restrictive in that it does not exclusively mean a diaper fetishist as many of us may receive sexual pleasure from diapers without it being a fetish & even others may not get anything sexual from it at all. I was using the term fetish loosely, not by its literal definition from the psychology handbook. DL can be used to describe those who are aroused by diapers so that was not necessarily a stretch.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You got that exactly right! Or in other words; an SD can also be DL, but DL cannot be SD.
 
Slomo said:
You got that exactly right! Or in other words; an SD can also be DL, but DL cannot be SD.

That defies logic. Correct would be; a SD may be a DL, but a DL is not necessarily a SD.

Some people may find diapers only sexual, wearing only when involved in sex. (SD only)
Some people may enjoy diapers when involved with sex, and also enjoy wearing diapers at other times for just comfort. (SD & DL)
Other people have no interest in sex when they are wearing diapers. (DL only)
 
ORBaby said:
That defies logic. Correct would be; a SD may be a DL, but a DL is not necessarily a SD.

Some people may find diapers only sexual, wearing only when involved in sex. (SD only)
Some people may enjoy diapers when involved with sex, and also enjoy wearing diapers at other times for just comfort. (SD & DL)
Other people have no interest in sex when they are wearing diapers. (DL only)

That IS what I said, maybe I simplified it too much.
 
this sounds more like a casual observation than an obsessive stare all night long. jeez people give him a break!
 
bambinod said:
this sounds more like a casual observation than an obsessive stare all night long. jeez people give him a break!

Along with enjoying diapers, one of our other compelling pastimes is eating our own.
 
sorry op, I just find it hard to wrap my head around that you saw this lady wearing a goodnite. Not saying it isnt possible but its very unlikely. Its one of those things that you have to see to believe, I guess. There are many products out there for women that cater to petite sizes....which would've been more likely, unless she is one of us (abdl) but even then, that would be about as rare as a lunar eclipse.
 
Well, women are known to be more incontinent in general than men. She could also be using it for her period, as others have mentioned.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top