TabulaRasa2017
Est. Contributor
- Messages
- 174
- Role
- Adult Baby
- Little
Hi everyone,
I hope your new year is off to a good start.
I've been realizing that the different labels we use for each other and for what we do often have different meanings for different people. Although I'm a lifelong ABDL, I've only recently immersed myself in the ABDL community through all of you wonderful people and that means I'm still kind of new to the "culture" of ABDL. I'm still learning.
I typically have not distinguished between wanting to be "little" versus wanting age play, but I'm realizing (and many of you probably already know this) that being little is often not associated with sex but age play typically is. So, I have been identifying as AB/Little because that type of age play is, shall we say, stimulating for me. But I don't have as much of a desire as I know some of you do to be little or wear diapers day to day (obviously, not including those who need diapers for medical reasons).
So my question is, would I have it right to say I am interested in age play rather than being little? The AB and diaper component is all there, but it's very much part of my sexual identity and not so much my day to day identity. Perhaps put more bluntly, I would not be wearing diapers and acting like I'm 2 years old if I were not getting something out of it sexually. And, I don't believe I'm DL because just wearing diapers without the baby aspects is not as exciting.
Hopefully I've kept this PG-13 but I'm happy to move this thread elsewhere.
Anyway, thanks for your thoughts on this. I am an old dog learning new tricks.
Be well.
I hope your new year is off to a good start.
I've been realizing that the different labels we use for each other and for what we do often have different meanings for different people. Although I'm a lifelong ABDL, I've only recently immersed myself in the ABDL community through all of you wonderful people and that means I'm still kind of new to the "culture" of ABDL. I'm still learning.
I typically have not distinguished between wanting to be "little" versus wanting age play, but I'm realizing (and many of you probably already know this) that being little is often not associated with sex but age play typically is. So, I have been identifying as AB/Little because that type of age play is, shall we say, stimulating for me. But I don't have as much of a desire as I know some of you do to be little or wear diapers day to day (obviously, not including those who need diapers for medical reasons).
So my question is, would I have it right to say I am interested in age play rather than being little? The AB and diaper component is all there, but it's very much part of my sexual identity and not so much my day to day identity. Perhaps put more bluntly, I would not be wearing diapers and acting like I'm 2 years old if I were not getting something out of it sexually. And, I don't believe I'm DL because just wearing diapers without the baby aspects is not as exciting.
Hopefully I've kept this PG-13 but I'm happy to move this thread elsewhere.
Anyway, thanks for your thoughts on this. I am an old dog learning new tricks.
Be well.