makena43 said:I am not incontemce. So is that problem?. Thank You for the other parts that answer questions.
makena43 said:Well to start off I think it's cool that you don't need proof that you are incontinence. I have a gut instinct that they are too chicken or just plain don't gave a hoot about me. I wear the tranquilly. Diaper and the rears rebel diaper depend on day and time I work. For Safeway. I make sure no way anybody sees plastic and I wear black baggy pants and lastly no way would I tell any Co worker
dogboy said:Well, they couldn't fire you if your were incontinent and needed them. If push came to shove, just say you have continence problems. That way, the severity isn't defined.
mayhem said:If you’re employed in the USA they cannot fire you because of the ADA (Americans with disabilities act) that was established in 1990
Tungsten said:I think bambinod’s post needs to be stickied at the top of every forum. They can fire you for any reason whatsoever. If you can prove IN COURT that you were fired because you belonged to a protected class, you might get your job back or compensated for damages.
But the burden of proof is on you, and it gets proved after you’re fired.
mayhem said:You’re wrong and that definitely is not how things work. You’re neither a lawyer, judge, or business owner. A business has to be VERY careful for the reason that an employee is fired for because they can possibly be sued.
Tungsten said:Um, that’s what ‘in court’ means. That they were sued. Nobody gets fired for being disabled. The get fired for no official stated reason. Maybe you were late to work one too many times, or maybe your position is no longer available.
But if you have no paper trail proving that you were fired because of a disability, good luck winning that lawsuit.
Businesses get sued all the time. It doesn’t faze them because they can afford lawyers, and they don’t have to explain on the record why they wear diapers to work.