Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16

Thread: Australian Internet Censorship: Going too far?

  1. #1

    Default Australian Internet Censorship: Going too far?

    Leaked Australian blacklist reveals banned sites - Wikileaks

    Very, very interesting read. if this bill gets passed (which I doubt), It could be possible that ADISC could be blocked for all Australians.

    Technically, the proposed system will reduce our internet speeds by up to 85%. A leading australian telecommunications company, IINet (I think) have puleld out of the plan, stating that It's deeply flawed, easy to bypass and is much more trouble than it's worth.



    "Far from containing just "illegal material" such as child pornography, the list of prohibited websites includes a wealth of legal material such as regular gay and straight porn sites, YouTube links, online poker sites, Wikipedia entries, euthanasia sites and even the sites of a Queensland dentist, a school canteen consultancy and an animal carer."

    "It became increasingly clear that the trial was not simply about restricting child pornography or other such illegal material, but a much wider range of issues including what the Government simply describes as 'unwanted material' without an explanation of what that includes."
    Your thoughts? Personally, I think the entire idea is absolutely, totally insane, and will cause a lot of backlash if it gets passed.

  2. #2

    Default

    That sounds ridiculous! I can't see how that will get passed.

    If it does everybody will just bypass it somehow anyways.

  3. #3

    Default

    I had read about this a week or soago. It is a great example of why I always have instant distrust of almost any "save the children" legislation. It seems to either come in two forms. Hilariously ill thought out laws that accomplish nothing in the long run and simply scare the shit out of people, or laws that are simply using the red menace of pedophilia to get censorship or worse passed in the name of "saving the children."

    As soon as you add kids into the mix people seem to lose their shit and turn off all ability to actually think. It's the community version of "stop the terrorists." There is a never ending sea of horribly vile shit on the internet, but censorship is being pushed in the name of the children. It is ridiculous.

  4. #4

    Default

    It makes me wonder how many things are blocked here in the U.S. and we don't even know about it. I'm always opposed to censorship, because it always relies on someone else's opinion. I can understand why child porn would be blocked, but it's like you said, when does something like adisc become blocked?

  5. #5

    Default

    Nothing is blocked universally in the US. One of the very issues of censuring like this, as has been brought up a lot in Australia, is that it is actually very difficult to do. It isn't something you can just up and decide to start doing and have it working. There is a rather large infrastructure required. On top of that it is simple enough to find a proxy.

    The net is so large you pretty much have to run a black list not a white list, and any time you run a blacklist you are pretty much guaranteed to fail. Unless you are running a white list security will eventually lose out to the determined individual.

  6. #6

    Default

    "For the children!"

    Somehow this must be a global illness at the moment. Germany tries the same. I just hope this law is never passed - or ripped apart by the high court afterwards.

    I think some of those really stupid politicians actually think they are doing the right thing, on the other hand they dont know what a browser is or does.

  7. #7

  8. #8

  9. #9

    Default

    Someone hacked a website and put up a anti-censorship message. I don't think they should really be charged with anything unless they did something really bad to screw up the system. This also shows the government that some people will not stand for bullshit like this.

    Hackers deface Aussie Classification Web site - News at GameSpot

  10. #10

    Default

    Yes.

    Without even reading the article.

    ANY restriction on Internet content that is placed outside the home of the "receiving end" of the content is too much. If there's a problem (CP, etc.) then it needs to be addressed at the source and only secondarily at each viewer's machine.



    Quote Originally Posted by Fire2box View Post
    Someone hacked a website and put up a anti-censorship message. I don't think they should really be charged with anything unless they did something really bad to screw up the system. This also shows the government that some people will not stand for bullshit like this.

    Hackers deface Aussie Classification Web site - News at GameSpot
    I disagree with you, Fire2box. A computer crime is still a computer crime, regardless of target or content. If someone stole my car because it's "bad for the environment" I would still want them prosecuted to the full extent of the law. I wouldn't roll over and say that, because I cannot afford a hybrid or hydrogen or electric car, I had the theft coming.

    The crime is the same, regardless of grounds or the target.

    I support the sentiment, but not the means of demonstration.

Similar Threads

  1. Internet censorship
    By Hex in forum Mature Topics
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 12-Apr-2009, 04:38
  2. The Internet
    By diaperedteenager in forum Off-topic
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 18-Mar-2009, 00:46
  3. Censorship
    By Charlie in forum Mature Topics
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 11-Dec-2008, 13:00
  4. Australian...are you?
    By spec888 in forum Off-topic
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 22-Oct-2008, 07:18
  5. censorship on the net
    By ade in forum Mature Topics
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 17-Aug-2008, 21:37

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
ADISC.org - the Adult Baby / Diaper Lover / Incontinence Support Community.
ADISC.org is designed to be viewed in Firefox, with a resolution of at least 1280 x 1024.