An interesting thought question I stumbled across the other day. Of the two following, which would you choose:
1) A cure for a deadly disease, you find/invent a cure that is cheap, safe, and save thousands, perhaps millions of lives.
2) You create a wondrous piece of art, that inspires people to feel better about their lives, making thousands, perhaps millions of people happier.
To make things as black and white as possible. You cannot justify one of your choices by having its consequences "bleed" into the other choice. As in: Picking the choice for art makes the people with teh disease happier, making them healthier
pick and option, then explain your reasoning if you want.