tsen
Est. Contributor
- Messages
- 69
- Role
- Adult Baby
- Diaper Lover
- Little
75 ab 25 dl
Trevor said:So in percentages, maybe 75% AB and 50% DL. I feel like that's misleading in a sense but so much of the DL hinges on the AB that I think it must be the larger part. Obviously, that's more than 100% but since I don't see them as a finite figure, it's more in an overall sense of intensity.
Cottontail said:...To use a celestial analogy, mine might be a case of a DL Jupiter orbiting a AB black hole. The former is physically large and easy to see. The latter is itty bitty and invisible (except indirectly), but is clearly in charge. So are AB and DL percentages based on size or mass? ...
Cottontail said:Hmm. That's an interesting way of looking at it/putting it. It might come down to definitions--which are contentious, so I'll take an oblique approach. Since joining ADISC and reflecting on things, I've decided that I can't be called DL-only, because, as it is for you, my enjoyment of diapers stems from an awareness that they are a baby thing. Like you, I don't exactly "regress" as other ABs do, but my wearing of diapers is, without a doubt, a limited sort of baby role-play, just spiked (heavily) with starkly non-baby sexuality. So am I AB enough to call myself an AB? I don't know. Possibly. To use a celestial analogy, mine might be a case of a DL Jupiter orbiting a AB black hole. The former is physically large and easy to see. The latter is itty bitty and invisible (except indirectly), but is clearly in charge. So are AB and DL percentages based on size or mass? I've labeled myself based on size, but the choice is non-obvious.
WBxx said:Rather than AB vs DL, the question for me is wetting vs diaper lover. Perhaps because diapers weren’t readily available in my formative years, I started out as predominantly a wetting lover. Over the years my interest in diapers has grown to the point I’m perhaps 50/50 wetting vs diaper. But still, a diaper is simply a means to an end for me, without wetting there is nothing.