First, ok I double checked the online definitions for love (for what so very little there is on this subject) Yup, love is not sexual in nature. Next argument.
Second, I never said I advocate in including children with ABDL content. I did say I find it wrong to discriminate against age though. Big difference. And yes, abdl being non sexual by nature, it would be completely legal. No need for a lawyer to verify something so incredibly simple to understand here.
Let me say this again. What I have been saying is interacting with children- in general- is not wrong nor illegal. I have even clarified this interaction is obviously to be free of any sexually explicit material. How more clear can I get than that. Why so many here are dead set on thinking otherwise is just plain misguided in fear mongering. Sorry, but it is.
Second, I never said I advocate in including children with ABDL content. I did say I find it wrong to discriminate against age though. Big difference. And yes, abdl being non sexual by nature, it would be completely legal. No need for a lawyer to verify something so incredibly simple to understand here.
Let me say this again. What I have been saying is interacting with children- in general- is not wrong nor illegal. I have even clarified this interaction is obviously to be free of any sexually explicit material. How more clear can I get than that. Why so many here are dead set on thinking otherwise is just plain misguided in fear mongering. Sorry, but it is.