xpluswearer said:
I do not have to provide proof. That you would have to look inward on all those who do this silly trill act. and ask yourself why do not I have extra money at end of the week or month after paying the bills .. wonder why you have a high electric or gas bill huh ? its all the washing your clothes and showers. Wonder why after a few years your washer and dryer needs replacement ? why you need to get a wardrobe change ? all that costs money and when you waste your money on that some will just say hey I can get free money from the taxpayer IE Food Stamps section 8 or Utility assistance or cash welfare to pay for the new washer or dryer that is where it crosses a line!
That act will not be paid for by me !
If you're going to make an argument, you need to back it up with something. Just a misguided opinion is not going to work.
If you want to argue about people wasting your tax dollars, what about all the women who pop out a kid every year, each with a different father, who then need to be supported with food stamps and other programs? But yet somehow you seem more concerned about this imaginary portion of the population who wet themselves so much it takes a financial toll.
I think any person of average intelligence who has a fetish for wetting themselves knows to stop before it gets to that level. I can't even imagine how often you'd need to do it to get to that point. I mean, even if you wet your pants once a day, how much extra laundry will you have to do? Maybe one or two extra loads a week. If that got too costly for the person, I think they would most likely cut back on peeing themselves, not think ''Gee, better go file for welfare!''
I don't know where you got this ridiculous idea. It would get costly if someone like you, who is incontinent, was dealing with their issue without protection, but that is not who you are talking about. Most people with a wetting fetish do not go around all day long wetting themselves and needing to change their clothes multiple times a day.
And guess what? Even if those imaginary pants-wetters did collect benefits, you'd be paying for it out of your taxes whether you like it or not, because it is not you who decides where that money goes.
Since you're so concerned, maybe you should just make yourself a picket sign and stand outside your local assistance office, or maybe write a letter to the editor of your local newspaper - ''No benefits for kinksters!'' Sound ridiculous? Yeah? Get the hint yet?