KawaiiBabyjenni said:
the padding should be within 1 1/2" - 2" of the top of the diaper, otherwise it looks like nothing more than a modified Depend . Just my personal opinion.
Jbdl said:
Hesitant about the lowrise padding in the front, deffs want to give it a try though. Anyone got a view of the back?
In ABU's defense, just keep in mind, this isn't supposed to be the same as the Space/Little Paws/SDKs/etc in terms of capacity. Those are supposed to be prolonged wearing, multiple wetting holding diaper so you stay dry for a longer time...much like a normal baby diaper. These are supposed to be the training pants diaper if you will, something that can probably only hold one wetting and maybe a smaller one. A diaper that you'd get changed out of right away when wet like you would at preschool. I think that is the idea here.
Hopefully, that means it's a on the thinner side and we'll be able to discreetly wear it out in public...because that's not something we've gotten in a new diaper lately. Everything is designed to hold a lake now, which is unfortunately since we've lost the Tena Slip Maxi, the perfect discreet diaper.
That said, the lowrise aspect of it is a little bit concerning, since guys especially can leak out of the top of the diaper. I'd like to see it go up a little higher myself, but thinner can be a good thing.
I'd be interested to hear Casey's thoughts on this, but, I think this diaper is supposed to have lesser padding.