I've seen the rather blunt definition of fetish thrown around: if you need some external object etc. to be present in order to be sexually aroused/fulfilled, then it'd a fetish. For me, this is not the case. I can get off with or without diapers and I don't give a second thought to it. I have no anxiety about "performing" when I know diapers won't be involved for example. I know there are some here who have no sexual association With diapers. Are there others here who really do fit this blunt definition: i.e. you really do need diapers in order to feel filled in a sexual encounter?
Just curious. Thanks for humorist me.
Do you think this definition is off or perhaps that there is a form of fetish that is definitely a pathology while there are other mild forms (we use the word kink often) that should not be considered a pathology?