![]() |
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Kunai-wielding editor
Staff Member
|
There's a big difference between "supporting gays" and simply having employee policies of tolerating them. This is where the AFA is wrong.
Let me come out right in the open with something right now: my family has long been in support of the AFA boycotts. We didn't buy anything Disney-related for about 10 years because of their boycott, though I believe the boycott was related to Eisner's choices of video productions rather than Disney's support of homosexual organizations. Yes, I am a Christian and I have a personal belief that homosexuality is wrong for a variety of reasons that I'm not going into. That's my personal stance. But it doesn't mean that I hate all gay people. If you do something to make me hate you, I'll probably hate you no matter what your sexual orientation is. And if you're a good friend of mine but you're gay, I'll probably eventually bring up the topic of religion and if you're not interested or are perfectly happy with your current standing and don't wish to hear anymore of me, I won't bug you about it anymore. After all, being a Christian (or part of any other religion/faith) is a personal choice, so why try to force people to make it? I've said it before and I'll say it again: this is the difference between the stereotypical Christian and the way a Christian really should act. If the world's at fault, then we sure as hell ain't no better a lot of the time. That out of the way, I have a hard time believing that everything that AFA says is right. I think what they conveniently leave out is that big companies like that tend to sponsor anyone that asks for money and put on a show of enthusiasm because they have one person on their board that is part of that organization, whatever the organization may be. I remember going to this "Asian" festival a couple years ago because my little sister's adopted from China. Guess who the big sponsor was? McDonald's... with their huge "i am... asian" [sic] banners all over the place. Yeah, the AFA dudes have a valid point. But they blow it WAY out of proportion. And I doubt that they're doing anything that Christians are actually supposed to do, such as actually witnessing to the folks at McDonalds. I try to ask myself, "if Jesus were working for the AFA, what would he do?" and I can't rightly answer that, but I'm sure it wouldn't be an outright "NEVER BUY FROM McD's THEY'RE EVIL" type message. Broadening things a bit, here's my stance on legalizing homosexual marriages in the USA. If it happens, then gay people will be getting married all over the place. How is it any different from what's going on right now, except for the fact that it's being recognized legally as a marriage? If Christians want to take down homosexuality, go for the root and not for the political crap. And the thing that really pisses me off? Dobson hates McCain just because he doesn't give a damn about gay marriage. McCain's not even in support of it. He just doesn't really care. And Dobson outright hates him. What does that make Barack "Mr. Diversity" Obama then? The Antichrist? Sheesh. (Thanks to Samaki in IRC for the link.) I'm not necessarily condoning McDonalds here. I guess what I really care about is their real underlying attitude about it, and since I don't know that I can't say anything one way or the other for sure. If they're doing it because one person on the board convinced them all to sponsor the Gay Pride parade and the rest don't care, then why does the AFA give a f#ck? OTOH, if their entire board and company policy actively push for that kind of stuff then I think it's pretty extreme for support of a minority group. I'd say that if their policy was overly biased towards Christians (or any other group) too. --Danny
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Regular
|
Danny you are my view of the perfect religious believer, I only know one person in RL who is anything like you, shes nice and kind, and when I asked her her opinion on homosexuality, her answer was: "It's against my religion but, it's not really my right to tell someone what they can or cannot be, they want to be gay or lesbian? That's fine with me."
She is a very good friend of mine, and she's awesome, she doesn't know about me of course but she's still awesome. I don't get how anyone could hate someone for just being who they are, sure they can think "WOAH thats really weird" but I don't understand how you can hate them without actually getting to know them, I only really hate meh 4 people, I dislike MANY MANY MANY people, but I don't hate them. Personally I think that if there is some sort of high being, maybe even a god, then that god created me the way I am for a purpose, and I'm glad he did I wouldn't have it any other way, even though I may have to go through many hard times I still love being who I am. My main thought for the purpose of having gays is maybe god or this higher being thought that the world was getting to overpopulated or something and just decided the best way to lower the population was to make gays and lesbians. Personally I think some girls are pretty and nice, but I don't go for body very much, I mainly go for personality, but guess what, the best person for me would be someone who is strong, confident and is kind and caring, I don't think I could get a girl like that, unless it is one of those body building girls, which I know I said I don't go for body, but I also included VERY MUCH, which I'm sorry but that is just one of those VERY MUCH situations... |
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Not The Sun
|
I love when people say things like:
"They are doing it for the money, f*** them!" Wow...they are assholes for doing it only for the money, but the outcome is still all the same. It goes back to my global warming agenda. If global warming is true, then all is well. If it isn't and we still take the measures to prevent global warming or stop pollution, it will still be helping the planet. On another note though. I do not think that companies should be pro or against something. They are companies... They already have a cause. It's called making money and selling their product, I do not see where any of this other stuff comes in. If they like gays, will the burgers become gay or something? Will the people who eat them become gay? Maybe so, but it just seems like people like to stir up the chocolate milk when it has already been properly shaken. (I am going to TM that analogy...Yes, I did just make it up.) On another note...it would be funny if people turned gay from eating McDonalds...Then like more than 3/4ths of America would be so flaming... One more note! Raise your hand if you miss my banters? FullMetal |
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | |
|
Regular
Historical Donor
|
My view on the issue about AFA (President?) Donald E. Wildmon is summed up by the first comment, which made me laugh several times before looking at the others: "what an asshat". Seriously, however, I think he has an extreme (either radical or conservative, depending on how you look at it) view on the "issue". Because of that, his view, and that of his association are severely biased.
On that note, I believe that our views are a bit biased as well (honestly, everyone's view is biased in some way). We tend to be a bit more radical than other groups, most likely because of our common relation and open-mindedness. I think that is why most people here would agree with what McDonald's did. Of course, this AFA is definitely against gays and lesbians, as members were 'alerted' that McDonald's was 'aggressively supporting a gay agenda'. Anyways, I support McDonald's decision nonetheless, although I wouldn't have known (or really cared) about it had the AFA not been involved, and had you, Prometheus, not linked this article because of that. My opinion is that gay people don't have a choice to be gay (and even if not so), it would be very difficult, if not impossible for them to physically, mentally, or even spiritually become straight. I believe in this just like with (and because of) transsexuals. It seems like they don't have a choice in the matter either of deciding who they are, and it would be wrong to criticize them because of that. But that's enough about my views, those don't really matter in this discussion. Note the last comment there, as I found it quite intriguing, and would like to tear it apart, if I may: Quote:
There were thoughtful comments posted there as well, though. The one posted on July 1st, whether or not you agree with it, appears to be fairly well thought out, by somebody (if not the original commenter), anyways. |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) |
|
Naughty or nice?!
|
Lol...a while ago, you used to get media attention for supporting gays. Nowadays, you get (negative) media attention for not supporting them. It's like writing "We protect the environment" into your firm strategy...it's common practice now, so people expect you to do it and move on.
Also, where do all those people with totally screwed up opinions about other people come from? Since when do they have any right to interfere with someone else's business. I hope that generation will die out soon! Peachy
__________________
A is like an apple with extra carpeting!Adopted users and furs : Magicstar, Christhefur, Kenshin Himura, baseball4life, Yumi, Rakai, Fullmetal, Little Ollie, mzkkbprmt (as a 2yo), EpicPie; to my kindergartenAward winning fruit
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|