Are pictures of diapered children considered child pornography, in your opinion?

Kovalchuk · 15-08-2009

Vote and voice your opinion. Keep it clean.

Not doing this poll for personal questions, but just to get a demographic.

baby_mike · 15-08-2009

No, not if they are aware that the picture is out there or they took it

BabyGrizzy · 15-08-2009

According to dictionary.com, Pornography refers to "Books, photographs, magazines, art, or music designed to excite sexual impulses and considered by public authorities or public opinion as in violation of accepted standards of sexual morality." So, yes, if it's meant to get you off, then its under that definition, it is pornographic in nature. I, personally, don't think it should be considered that way. I'm not so sure that its one of those things that is likely to fuck you up for the rest of your life, but it certainly isn't right to take picture of kids in such a manner. However, what ever floats your boat, and as long as you aren't the one doing the pictures.

NoahKokoro · 15-08-2009

I think it is only if it's on a child porn site. I'm sure some weirdos would get off to pics of children in diapers in provocative poses.

Anon E. Mouse · 15-08-2009

On the man's eternal quest for porn, I've definitely seen kids in diapers...clearly meant as porn. No thanks.

On the other hand, it is definitely not always porn, just as adults in diapers isn't always porn.

People can use pretty much anything as porn providing they have the proper interests. But sometimes it's meant to be, and when it comes to things like kids in it, I personally find it more than a bit disgusting.

Matrix · 15-08-2009

I think it really depends on how it's used, if it's just Mom and Dad's pictures of their cute kid, it's innocent. But when someone gets off on it, then it is child porn. And if it's on a porn site, then it's porn. Kind of a fuzzy line. But that's just me.

Canuck · 15-08-2009

I say yes if the reason the picture was taken/posted is for the explicate purposed of promoting sexual arousal/behavior. That clearly is child pornography and those people need to be caught.

However, people take pictures of their kids all the time and post them online. I don't think that that constitutes child pornography. In saying this though; People need to be more aware of their pictures. They need to restrict downloads on their galleys or make them password protected to keep unwanted individuals out. I think the problem is that people aren't tech literate enough to fully understand the sweeping consequences of posting pictures openly on the internet.

Edit - matrix got his post in a little bit quicker than I did

secretdl26 · 15-08-2009

I think it's all about intent. Whether or not the intent of the photo is to be pornographic determines whether or not it is actually pornography.

mm3 · 15-08-2009

If they are doing nasty sexual-oriented poses, yes. If it's just a kid in a diaper, no.

NeiNei · 15-08-2009

When the pictures are looked at in a sexual way or are meant to be sexual, then yes, it is child pornography. However, if it's just a picture of a cute little kid or something in a medical guide, it is not considered pornography...until somebody jacks off to it. Then you can say it's porn.

View Poll Results: As the title asks.
Yes.	16	14.81%
No.	61	56.48%
Undecided/Other	31	28.70%
Voters: 108. You may not vote on this poll

15-08-2009	#1 (permalink)
Kovalchuk Resident Hockey Nut Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Philips Arena Age: 16 Posts: 1,528 Threads: 242 Gallery Uploads: 11 Wiki Edits: 4 Blog Entries: 2 Reputation: 55	Are pictures of diapered children considered child pornography, in your opinion? Vote and voice your opinion. Keep it clean. Not doing this poll for personal questions, but just to get a demographic. Also, this has potential to be a hot thread. Last edited by Kovalchuk; 15-08-2009 at 04:53 AM.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Have you ever known anyone you considered might be an infantilist?	Kovalchuk	TeenBaby	66	01-02-2009 07:17 PM
Adult baby/adult child + children	care_a_lot	Adult Baby	7	22-07-2008 05:17 PM

15-08-2009	#2 (permalink)
baby_mike Regular Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: The woods Age: 18 Posts: 836 Threads: 157 Blog Entries: 3 Reputation: 1	No, not if they are aware that the picture is out there or they took it

15-08-2009	#3 (permalink)
BabyGrizzy VIP Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: California, USA Age: 16 Posts: 994 Threads: 78 Gallery Uploads: 37 Wiki Edits: 7 Blog Entries: 1 Reputation: 29	According to dictionary.com, Pornography refers to "Books, photographs, magazines, art, or music designed to excite sexual impulses and considered by public authorities or public opinion as in violation of accepted standards of sexual morality." So, yes, if it's meant to get you off, then its under that definition, it is pornographic in nature. I, personally, don't think it should be considered that way. I'm not so sure that its one of those things that is likely to fuck you up for the rest of your life, but it certainly isn't right to take picture of kids in such a manner. However, what ever floats your boat, and as long as you aren't the one doing the pictures.

15-08-2009	#4 (permalink)
NoahKokoro Regular Join Date: May 2009 Location: Texas, USA Age: 16 Posts: 305 Threads: 5 Reputation: 6	I think it is only if it's on a child porn site. I'm sure some weirdos would get off to pics of children in diapers in provocative poses.

15-08-2009	#5 (permalink)
Anon E. Mouse Regular Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Texas, USA Age: 19 Posts: 303 Threads: 6 Wiki Edits: 16 Reputation: 3	On the man's eternal quest for porn, I've definitely seen kids in diapers...clearly meant as porn. No thanks. On the other hand, it is definitely not always porn, just as adults in diapers isn't always porn. People can use pretty much anything as porn providing they have the proper interests. But sometimes it's meant to be, and when it comes to things like kids in it, I personally find it more than a bit disgusting.

15-08-2009	#6 (permalink)
Matrix Regular Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Seattle Area, Washington, USA Age: 17 Posts: 217 Threads: 20 Gallery Uploads: 4 Blog Entries: 42 Reputation: 3	I think it really depends on how it's used, if it's just Mom and Dad's pictures of their cute kid, it's innocent. But when someone gets off on it, then it is child porn. And if it's on a porn site, then it's porn. Kind of a fuzzy line. But that's just me.

15-08-2009	#7 (permalink)
Canuck Regular Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada Posts: 43 Threads: 2 Reputation: 1	I say yes if the reason the picture was taken/posted is for the explicate purposed of promoting sexual arousal/behavior. That clearly is child pornography and those people need to be caught. However, people take pictures of their kids all the time and post them online. I don't think that that constitutes child pornography. In saying this though; People need to be more aware of their pictures. They need to restrict downloads on their galleys or make them password protected to keep unwanted individuals out. I think the problem is that people aren't tech literate enough to fully understand the sweeping consequences of posting pictures openly on the internet. Edit - matrix got his post in a little bit quicker than I did

15-08-2009	#8 (permalink)
secretdl26 Regular Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Troy, NY Age: 18 Posts: 453 Threads: 11 Blog Entries: 1 Reputation: 3	I think it's all about intent. Whether or not the intent of the photo is to be pornographic determines whether or not it is actually pornography.

15-08-2009	#9 (permalink)
mm3 Babyfur Extraordinaire Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: New York, NY Age: 17 Posts: 1,793 Threads: 104 Gallery Uploads: 3 Wiki Edits: 3 Reputation: 41	If they are doing nasty sexual-oriented poses, yes. If it's just a kid in a diaper, no.

15-08-2009	#10 (permalink)
NeiNei Sparky's Mommy Pup <3 Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Florida, USA Posts: 414 Threads: 6 Gallery Uploads: 2 Wiki Edits: 2 Blog Entries: 14 Reputation: 15	When the pictures are looked at in a sexual way or are meant to be sexual, then yes, it is child pornography. However, if it's just a picture of a cute little kid or something in a medical guide, it is not considered pornography...until somebody jacks off to it. Then you can say it's porn.