![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: 1-10 | |||
| 1 |
|
2 | 13.33% |
| 2 |
|
1 | 6.67% |
| 3 |
|
1 | 6.67% |
| 4 |
|
3 | 20.00% |
| 5 |
|
0 | 0% |
| 6 |
|
1 | 6.67% |
| 7 |
|
3 | 20.00% |
| 8 |
|
3 | 20.00% |
| 9 |
|
0 | 0% |
| 10 |
|
1 | 6.67% |
| Voters: 15. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Changed AIM for privacy
Historical Donor
Staff Member |
Assuming they are the same as CVS diapers, I'd say they hold better than Depends, and the leg cuff things are a bit longer...I don't know what they rank on the scale, but I'd recommend them if you can't get anything better than things you can get in a store
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Eat my wikidust
Staff Member
|
Offhand I'd say you don't need that many options - just "great", "good", "average", "fair", and "poor" would probably suffice, and you could really score by including more descriptive options like "they hold a lot, but aren't very comfortable when wet."
I have been using Walgreens brand for a while... they hold their own but aren't terrific. They feel a bit thin if you're used to doubling up or wearing something thicker like Attends or Bambinos. I wouldn't recommend them for use beyond about one wetting. About a year ago they started making them cloth-backed too, which annoys the hell out of me. I'd go with something else if you can - an online order would be best. However, Walgreens diapers will do if you're in a pinch and don't mind cloth-like backing. --Danny
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Not your typical kid
|
When I tried these they were not the same as CVS's at all. They were very thin, the leg gathers were not soft and irritated my legs. The tapes didn't stay tayped very well, and the capacity was negligible. Needless today, I didn't buy again.
I would take Depends over these any day. |
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Regular
|
I gave them a 4, decent if you staple the tapes to the backsheet. They hold one wetting but will press out if it was w big one. They are exactly the same as CVS except the tapes are a bit narrower. The CVS need stapling too. Not like the top brands for ultamite capicty or comfort but cheep, easy to buy and fun.
Nam |
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Changed AIM for privacy
Historical Donor
Staff Member |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Regular
|
Quote:
The best part is they are far cheaper than the Depends and they are comparable in capacity. Fit wise. I like the Depends Max better. The cuffs on the Walgreens ones are a bit tight around the legs. $12-17 for 40 of the Walgreens brand. $12-17 for 16 Depends Max. You'll change far more frequently using cheaper diapers, but diapering is half the fun isn't it? |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Regular
|
I refuse to give an answer because you asked like a ****ing 4 year old. LEARN ENGLISH!
But because I love these diapers, then I will answer. They are excellent at absorption, unless you want to walk around. I have heard that you can't pee while laying down, though. I would greatly recommend this as a first diaper. |
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
VIP
|
personaly I like Walgreens, for the day. I do not like them at night obut only beacause they are not an overnight thickness. Though for wearing to work, or out and about I love them. They are soft with the feel of a pull, but the ability for easy removal and change without undressing.
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Is this a good plan? | fantasy | Diaper Talk | 33 | 04-08-2008 02:21 AM |
| Is it good | Death Angel | Diaper Talk | 13 | 01-08-2008 10:06 PM |
| Beyond Good & Evil 2 | ScubaSteve | Computers and Games | 12 | 29-05-2008 09:33 PM |
| I can't think of a good avatar | mzkkbprmt | Off-topic | 28 | 15-05-2008 05:24 AM |
| A good diaper | VR Wolf | Diaper Talk | 40 | 08-05-2008 01:49 AM |