ADISC.org  

Answers Wiki Galleries Live Chat Links Referrals
Go Back   ADISC.org > Happy New Steer > Diaper Talk
Register Blogs FAQ Mark Forums Read

Closed Thread Post New Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 16-07-2008   #1 (permalink)
Regular
 
Princess_Mandy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Alabama, US
Posts: 107
Threads: 5
Gallery Uploads: 3
Blog Entries: 4
Reputation: 3
Default Got a Question?

I have a question for someone who has worn Goodnights and underjams before. Which one is bigger? and I don't mean by the sizing on the packages. I bought underjams before and they fit well but I was just wondering about the goodnights. Doses any one know?
Princess_Mandy is offline  
Old 16-07-2008   #2 (permalink)
Lurker
Historical Donor
 
Darkfinn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Charlotte, NC
Age: 24
Posts: 2,720
Threads: 68
Gallery Uploads: 16
Wiki Edits: 4
Blog Entries: 17
Default

Goodnites are far superior to underjams. They are sized larger and cover more area.
Darkfinn is offline  
Old 16-07-2008   #3 (permalink)
Will you be my lion?
Historical Donor
Staff Member
 
Abby_Cullen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Forks, Washington.
Age: 18
Posts: 2,345
Threads: 93
Gallery Uploads: 37
Blog Entries: 11
Default

Well I haven't tried both, so my word won't be worth too much.

However, I've heard that the underjamz stretch more width wise, but are far shorter. Now, I'm assuming your female so you don't have to worry about your "package" fitting or not, but with goodnites, you do have to worry about your hips. (Depending on how big they are.) I know I've had problems with the goodnites ripping because I have big hips.
Abby_Cullen is online now  
Old 16-07-2008   #4 (permalink)
Regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: none
Posts: 1,304
Threads: 3
Default

I have tried GN's and I like those, haven't tried the underjams as of yet, I have one I just haven't used it so far.

I sorta stuck on a plastic covered diaper, I like those the best.
ballucanb is offline  
Old 16-07-2008   #5 (permalink)
VIP
Historical Donor
 
Pramrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Maryland, USA
Age: 58
Posts: 1,376
Threads: 105
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ballucanb View Post
I have tried GN's and I like those, haven't tried the underjams as of yet, I have one I just haven't used it so far.
I liked the GoodNites, too. When I first heard about the Underjams in this forum I was seriously thinking of trying them at my next opportunity. Now I'm having second thoughts after reading that they come up shorter than the GNs. Really don't want to waste money on baby items which don't fit comfortably, or don't fit at all as I did with the Pampers #7.

~Pramrider
Pramrider is online now  
Old 16-07-2008   #6 (permalink)
VIP
 
Maverick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: New Jersey, USA
Age: 15
Posts: 1,309
Threads: 25
Gallery Uploads: 4
Wiki Edits: 2
Blog Entries: 1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pramrider View Post
I liked the GoodNites, too. When I first heard about the Underjams in this forum I was seriously thinking of trying them at my next opportunity. Now I'm having second thoughts after reading that they come up shorter than the GNs. Really don't want to waste money on baby items which don't fit comfortably, or don't fit at all as I did with the Pampers #7.

~Pramrider
They looked like the fit FullMetal well. But I can't offer any input on this, unfortunately I haven't tried either of them. Just seen pictures.
Maverick is offline  
Old 17-07-2008   #7 (permalink)
VIP
 
closet dl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 141
Threads: 4
Gallery Uploads: 3
Default

GN's are larger, but less absorbent and don't stretch as much as UJ's. UJ's are more comfortable as well.
closet dl is offline  
Old 17-07-2008   #8 (permalink)
Regular
 
Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: I am whereever my Imagination takes me
Age: 18
Posts: 249
Threads: 16
Blog Entries: 6
Reputation: 3
Default

The goodnight boxers don't fit nearly as well, but I have a feeling the normal goodnights are much better. I have tried the underjams and the boxer style goodnights and I'd say the underjams are much better, I am trying the normal goodinghts tomorrow. So I'll post again than
Dave is offline  
Old 17-07-2008   #9 (permalink)
Regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 134
Threads: 7
Reputation: 0
Default

both are to small for me.
me but i think under jams strech more and are more absorbent then goodnights
wetatnight is offline  
Old 17-07-2008   #10 (permalink)
Regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: none
Posts: 1,304
Threads: 3
Default

I'm not crazy about low rise anything, and according to the adds on the tube, UJ's are made to fit lower so they won't be noticed as much, so they have to be lower than the GN's, and on me the GN's fit a little low.

When I wear low rise breifs they drive me nuts, so a low rise diaper would do nothing for me, but drive me crazy.

But if your some one who likes low rise maybe these will work for you.
ballucanb is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
question man man TeenBaby 14 27-06-2008 04:15 AM
A question Ren Incontinence 6 28-02-2008 08:28 PM
question LostPup Diaper Talk 12 25-01-2008 12:57 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
Site content is Copyright ADISC.org 2008.
Content from this site may not be reproduced anywhere else
without the advance written permission of the webmaster, or author.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16