![]() |
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |||
|
Regular
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
But yeah, whatever floats your boat I suppose
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |
|
Meh
|
Quote:
2. I said Quad Core not Dual core but a Dual core at 3.06 GHz is pretty nice. but a Quad Core is the best you can get for todays market and like I said you can overclock it to 3.0GHz as well. If you think your little duo 2.4 Ghz is "FAST" then you seen nothing yet. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
Regular
Historical Donor
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Regular
|
I actually didn't get the iBook right away. I got myself a big-ass Toshiba laptop. It was cheaper. It had 'higher' specs. It was a complete piece of junk and had the aesthetic appeal of a cinder block. It was only after I returned it that I nabbed an iBook.
I think the point I'm making here is not everybody really cares about having something that can score higher on benchmark tests than the other guy's machine. Some people just want efficient, good-looking machines that get the job done with minimum effort and, you know, have cash to spare. Personally I use both PCs and Macs in tandem so don't draw me into this Mac user/PC user dichotomy some people obviously seem to believe exists. |
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
Meh
|
Quote:
Verscha, you bought a cheaper laptop with overall better specs but you switch it for a mac since it looks cooler on the outside? Isn't that along the same lines of "I got better specs then him"? At least with the specs you would end up having a better computer. Having it look good on the outside should not outweigh whats on the inside. Hench the term "Beauty Is Only Skin Deep". |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) | |
|
Regular
|
Quote:
But whatever. |
|
|
|