Quote:
Originally Posted by ShippoFox
ok, then substitute the numbers for lower numbers. Like I said, it's not porn, but that fox avatar I made could be 8, 18, 22, 32, 30910928, or anything. Lots of people have styles that make the characters look a different age. Basically, someone draws something, someone else misinterprets it, and then everyone screams "That's cub art ban him!" Doesn't sound fair. Though to take the other side of the argument, the whole idea of cub porn is kinda stupid because such characters wouldn't be having sex in the first place.... 
|
Well, the chans I've seen so far have this rule to decide that: no tits, no erected penis and no cum (male and female) = underaged. A drawing that cannot be classified on either age group (for any reasons) is immediately deleted. It's also obvious when people draw cub art, because it is intentionally done to look like a cub. Also the proportions in the body help to tell an underage from a mature.
And well, you can depict cubs and upload the drawing without any kind of restriction as long as it is clean: not sexual, erotic or ay other kind of intentional arousing material. Personally I'm against of any form of cub art in such chans, EVEN under the "clean" section, because (1) it makes the whole fandom to look bad and (2) it can be easily misunderstood into pedophilia, which just suit worse into the fandom.
As for Fchan, well everything is fine, just that i found /ah/ rather perturbing. I'm not complaining, since it is my own decision to look at such boards, I'm just giving my point of view.