![]() |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Regular
|
First, please pardon my English. I'm 15 years old and Swedish, so I ain't perfect. On the topic though.
I say the "Lurker" statu isn't really enough. If one goes on vacation he/she isn't lurking around - since he/she ain't browsing the site. On the other hand a person who reads the site often without posting, that could be called "lurking". So a new status would be like "Inactive" And one problem which I really don't know a sollution to. You see, I rarely post because I'm suffering from melancholia. So when I was degraded to a lurker was kind of depressing. Since there isn't so much I can do about it. Any ideas on that sorta things? Thanks, |
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
What's up doc?
Historical Donor
Staff Member |
These threads can give a good answer to your questions:
Limited Access Is Stupid Remove The Activity System? Lurker?!? Limited Access?? |
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Regular
|
I really see no real point in commenting on that, since it should be so obvious. But since I'm so nice today, I'm going to shed some light on that ignorance of yours.
Right now I'm 14 years and about 10 months. As many people today do (including me) I'm going to round off that number which equals 15. See? It wasn't so hard now was it? It's just common sense. If you want me te explain it more detailed to you just ask me. Geez. |
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Head Jester
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Regular
|
As a formerly quite active member who's been away long enough to have to brave the rigors of "access denied; fall to thy prayers old man, we know thee not" I don't see my hardships as undue. Sure it's a pain to feel (temporarily) spurned by the system, but as was said above, 20 posts is not too high a number to have to make...
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| lurker, status |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|