Negative Reputation Limit

[ade]

Originally Posted by Akira

Obviously they're doing something to offend people enough that more than ten people complain about it.

but, what if the truth is offensive to most posters here?
should a person be penalised for simply telling the truth?

[Akira]

Originally Posted by ade

but, what if the truth is offensive to most posters here?
should a person be penalised for simply telling the truth?

It's not the truth that offends people.
It's the way they present themselves while doing it. A bunch of swear words, poor grammar, it's just not needed.

[Mr Alex]

Not really, I've told the truth before, that didn't hurt anyone, Democrats reduce the amount of freedom in the United States in respect to taking away my right to own what type of firearms I want. Apparently the truth was offensive. I didn't say anything negative about Democrats. I realize that most of ADISC sadly is, just look at the presidential candidates poll.

I believe, that if you and I mean YOU are not offended by what is said, then YOU should not negative rep for it.

I had about -4 a very long time ago for some issue that I cannot quite remember, I remember that I said something to a newbie, that was offensive, to our forum members, the newbie did not care when I PM'ed him and apologized. Certain exceptions to this rule I can see, some of my posts, I suppose deserve it if you want to be complainy about it.

That ends my rant on this topic.